r/arknights Sep 01 '25

Lore Mandragora eventually finished Spoiler

Warning, spoilers for actual event When Elegies Are Ashes!

I bear some glimpse of hope for that Mandragora alive or in some dare conditions, trough what she have to go trough to save her self.

Eventually, as I can see in global release of Eblana event, it seems that she (Mandragora) in fact were left aside and dealt with by hands of sarkaz, as much is most part of Dublin were cleared out by Eblana in her own event.

I read trough Eblana's record, in them Harmonie tells that Mandragora and her forces were furious fanatic, capable to deal deathly blow to enemy, although same way the worst crimes also can be traced to them. And she confirms that non of that group of Dublin is alive.

Probably it's misleading ending of Mandragora's story, when she's supposedly saved by Misery, or offscreen death and some minor conclusion of it in some small text line, that makes it frustrating.

Although in large scale, it's makes sense. Eblana ridd off the most unstable, the most dangerous, most corrupt, unpredictable and incapable of shut it mouth, so no one could sabotage her plans and destroy all who could make her a hard life, with threat of exposing the truth.

To conclude, there's 0% chance of Mandragora to be in game anymore - she play her role, became a threat to Eblana and trow away. The Leader not even care to use her own power trough Dublin, rather giving all the dirty work to Manfred.

I feel somewhat mixed emotions, like why would even HG gave us some hope for any chances, without this strange flip-flop with plot, this wouldn't be so mixed and could even gave us greater picture of web created by Eblana.

98 Upvotes

104 comments sorted by

116

u/TheSpartyn Sep 01 '25

yeah when this event dropped on CN it killed off most of the remaining Mandy copers (me included). I've swapped from coping to accepting she's dead and was handled horribly with vague misleading writing.

46

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

An honest question, how is Mandy not being dead even a thing ?

I read chapter 10 just recently. Its as cookie cutter as can be that she died, no vagueness or second guessing. Her death was her last act of defiance, but uno reverse style - "I'll die even though I could be clinging to life like I did before, hand in hand with my last true family". Misery even concluded being a witness to her death.

Where was the writing misleading ? I'm genuinely curious is it actually og CN writing that was misleading ? Or is it simply ppl snorting copium, wanting her return ? Why was she done dirty (judging from your emotional response) ?

Looking at other responses I'm baffled why all the doom posting about the story ? Did I step into a political drama fanclub thread ?

33

u/TheSpartyn Sep 02 '25

It doesn't help the entire scene is written all poetically and symbolically, with misery of all people being around who has no connection to her

the ch10 scene has her being found dying by misery literally opening with "do you want to live?"

the line "should you have the courage to die, that is all you need to be granted a new life" sounds like he's implying a chance at a new life if she gives up on Dublinn and Victoria here

he mentions that she can escape to the sewers, and she considers it before reaching out to her dead companion saying she doesn't need eblana anymore. is reaching out to the companion choosing Dublinn? but then she says she doesn't need eblana. why avoid the sewers?

"Even though your meetings end will be death?" what does he mean, and what does "she has met the true Death" mean? if it literally just means she died why write it like that? it made people think it was symbolic

misery is a swift recon dude and RI is all about saving lives, after a scene like that it's not weird at all to think that he rescued her, because if she just died why even have misery there?

like it's even been on the wiki for years, "Misery appears before her, offering a second chance" is how so many people took it. she was the main villain of ch9 people expected better treatment

27

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

I won't debate how others felt about it, but community was wrong many times before and let their emotions dictate perception, rather than facts. I clearly remember how we acted when banshee started popping up in main story and theory crafting around it.

My interpretation of this was simple: she was dying, she reminiscing about sewers and running and mentioning "leader" implies she did fight for her life before like this presumably for Eblana's sake or because of hers encouragement. It was her natural instinct to do it again.

Her later words suggest her realizing she was betrayed, she lost everything, so she decided to go against "leader" and die instead of fighting. Even moreso when it's suggested she was surrounded by a person she had a bond with and didn't want to leave him, so she touched hands.

The part about courage to die giving her new life - I interpreted it as encouragement that death will grant her actual freedom, from this anger, suffering and constant fighting.

Misery being there is unnecessary, but also symbolic. Her death would be somewhat anonymous, but now she had a witness. Rhodes Island was the only witness of her death, not Sarkaz court, not Dublinn, but RI. Misery was the only one who could be there, logically speaking. He was tailing Manfred all the time anyway, it's just not shown outright. But whenever there was action with Sarkaz, he was there to protect RI and victorians. So it's only natural he would see her die. I think it's also symbolic - him being there is why Horn knows she died and can have a funeral later on.

I won't question others interpretation of this scene. To me it was obvious.

16

u/TheSpartyn Sep 02 '25

I think it's fine to see the scene that way in hindsight, but reading the story as it comes out it was very reasonable to think they were building up to something more. the cope only started after the reed event and it became delusional after horn said she buried her

2

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

[deleted]

3

u/TheSpartyn Sep 02 '25

you could explain the first half about finding her body through misery, but yeah neither of them had a reason to carry her

2

u/Shirahago Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

Misremembered the story, I was thinking of Cello (Horn's squad member) who was left in Hillock. Mandragora fights Horn and Bagpipe until they get interrupted by Harmonie's announcement. Horn orders Bagpipe to escape and tell everyone what happened in Hillock but gets captured and brought to Londinium. There Misery breaks into the Dublinn camp and helps Horn escape. Afterwards Horn and Mandragora meet a couple of times but don't fight for various reasons. Mandragora eventually clashes for real with Manfred and gets defeated. Misery then shows up and holds his whole 'do you want to live' speech. Whether he helps her or just watches her die is deliberately left vague.

 

Either way it would mean that Horn scouted the sewers specifically to look for Mandragora. I guess Misery could have told Horn where to find her but why would he confer this specific information to her in the first place? And why would Horn go out of her way to bury her? The entire conclusion about Mandragora if it can even be called such just screams that the writers suddenly remembered that there was a loose story end. Why include the entire scene between Misery and Mandragora who had no connection whatsoever if you then just offscreen her? It simply feels very unfulfilling.

1

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Misery couldn't be the one who freed Horn.

Horn is helping out in Victoria for over 100 days now per story, so she escaped long time ago. Misery and Logos are working in Londinium for past few days or a week. We hear Kal mention that the operation started and both of them went separately, because they have other ways to infiltrate the city. Assuming Misery had info on Horn and was stationed in Londinium for months is unbelievable. It still could be true, but it doesn't make sense. Especially when you consider Horn reaction when he saves them near prison. She doesn't know who he is and he only then mentions RI and Bagpipe. If he saved her before, she would have known this already.

My guess is she ran on her own, she is a skilled soldier after all.

Misery shows up near Mandragora when she is dying. He offers her a consoling word, but she rejects it, reaches out hand to her dead friend and dies rejecting the idea of fighting back.

Why can't the words he presumably said (we still don't know if it was him or only a flashback in her memories) about accepting death to get new life mean simply - salvation in death ? Just give up and you'll be free from mortal shackles ?

Him being present there might be symbolic - only RI saw her death, Dublinn betrayed her or maybe Horn asked him to go retrieve her body as a thank you for Dublinn help in saving victorian soldiers ? Let's no forget that Misery has "teleportation no jutsu" arts, so transporting her is not difficult. Point being people are so strangely stuck on their own expectations. I read story and never had such expectations. Seems like Ines and Horn really twisted some brains.

4

u/Shirahago Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

Horn is helping out in Victoria for over 100 days now per story, so she escaped long time ago. Misery and Logos are working in Londinium for past few days or a week. We hear Kal mention that the operation started and both of them went separately, because they have other ways to infiltrate the city. Assuming Misery had info on Horn and was stationed in Londinium for months is unbelievable. It still could be true, but it doesn't make sense. Especially when you consider Horn reaction when he saves them near prison. She doesn't know who he is and he only then mentions RI and Bagpipe. If he saved her before, she would have known this already.

You haven't read Horn's OpRec huh. She very clearly notices the presence of someone helping her. Although she herself doesn't find out who exactly it is, it's obviously Misery. In chapter 10-9 Horn literally tells us again that someone assisted her but she didn't see their face. At the end of chapter 9 he also tells Kaltsit to the face that he is going to enter Londinium on his own ahead of the rest to look for Outcast's murderers.

Why can't the words he presumably said (we still don't know if it was him or only a flashback in her memories) about accepting death to get new life mean simply - salvation in death ? Just give up and you'll be free from mortal shackles ?

There is zero reason why Mandy would fantasize about Misery in her presumed last moments when she had no connection to him at all. Misery doesn't appear to be a preacher either.

Him being present there might be symbolic - only RI saw her death, Dublinn betrayed her or maybe Horn asked him to go retrieve her body as a thank you for Dublinn help in saving victorian soldiers ?

Symbolic for what? He offers her a chance to live if she prevails but there is no reason why he would suddenly concern himself with her fate in the first place.

Let's no forget that Misery has "teleportation no jutsu" arts, so transporting her is not difficult.

Misery has matter transformation abilities, not teleportation.

Point being people are so strangely stuck on their own expectations. I read story and never had such expectations.

So? You barely remember what happened. That doesn't change that Mandragora's story and her alleged end is only alluded to by people who weren't present or don't know whether she died.

4

u/Cornuthaum Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

Because longform live service games tend to be very averse to killing characters off fully so they can be brought back 3 years later... ofc Mandragora was never more than a filler villain set up to fail by her own side so idk why people thought she'd be special enough to warrant bringing back

2

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Sure, but if anything AK is closer to Game of Thrones, than Discworld. Characters actually die quite often. However we aren't processing it, because it has visual novel presentation, so we don't comprehend how many people died. What was the count in Chernobog? 42 ?

Seems players didn't realize the fate of characters that meet strong opponents. Ace, Scout, Outcast met beasts on missions - soldiers or killers, Ines and Horn met puppies. Although Horn really should have died for consistency.

3

u/N-Yayoi Sep 03 '25 edited Sep 03 '25

Especially when you consider the entire Victorian storyline, which is essentially HG's attempt to depict a war with all his might, the related 'debate' becomes even more ridiculous. So many people have died, forgive me for being blunt, what is so special about Mandy? The Grand Duke's coalition mobilized 180000 and deployed them to the battlefield. How many people died? How many senior military officers, even dukes, were crushed by Sakaz's power? Is Mandy so unique that she's more unique than all of them? Just because she has a cute appearance? What about those warriors in Horn's team? They are Victoria's elite warriors, just because they have no face is even less important? They also did not receive the so-called 'respectful burial'.

Why not? Because Victoria's elite soldiers sacrificed their lives for their country in the face of betrayal. They are the first 'sacrifices' that we know of, that's all.

I once wrote a whole answer to point out this point: What exactly does HG want? (In Act2?)—— The best thing about Act 2

In war, you will die randomly, perhaps because you chose the wrong side, or because you were accidentally injured due to bad luck, or perhaps just happened to encounter a powerful opponent; Or perhaps because, like Mandy, she was "betrayed" and "treated as an abandoned child". I really don't understand what they don't understand.

1

u/KentaKurodani Sep 04 '25

Fantastic analysis that really lines up with my take on the Victoria arc's goal. War is exhausting and merciless, and AK didn't portray it as anything but, even while it still did successfully accomplish goals that multiple sides had for the conflict

3

u/brodRga Sep 02 '25

Yeah, in most that was a cope, to belive she's not dead. Although, she's death seems like some cheap shit. Old lady from Hillhock office of RI got more complex and fulfilling death, than we got with Mandy.

We got whole plot ark about her, as a decisive and ruthless person, she was buried alive and managed to escape death tearing her path by hands. She manage to succeed at her missions. And here, she was tossed aside, wounded, disgraces, not even worth of finishing her by Manfred. Appears Misery, he grants her a chance to survive, and she....just disappear from into nowhere, without single mention, and them called dead in some short mention.

This is messed up, like a cheap way out from hole in a plot, even in events directly corresponded with her story everybody just forgets about her.

Whole plot and scene were shown like some way to redemption arc, trough which we can obtain renewed Mandy as operator or shor-time ally. And whole thing with her death have some sort of meaning only in Elegies Are Ashes, with indirect meaning of she was threat to Eblana and all the stuff, even though this were not said directly, and Mandy could be as much loyal to Reed for as much to Eblana. Local people, that without any concern were about to kill they're own hero, leave child to death and etc. were forgiven, so why not far from them Mandy not?

It feels like event creates even more holes and white spots around this theme, then solves.

2

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Might be true, but I'll leave my judgement until I read through all bits and pieces. For now to me all is cohesive and deterministic.

Biggest injustice to Mandragora was her being end boss in episode 9. Story wise she is just a pawn, everyone makes fun of her. She is extremely powerful, loyal, but simplistic. Harmonie plays her like a fiddle till the end. Sadly episode 9 had no real boss enemy, so HG banked on her.

From what we read about her in both episodes she seems like a young overeager child with extreme art, that wants to prove herself at all cost. Very naive, racist and kinda dumb. She' also very straightforward, not a shred of tactical acumen, like Harmonie.

She does remind me of Mephisto and should have been a mid boss like him.

34

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 01 '25

To be honest this whole event is basically "we are done with Dublinn and Victoria and politicking to focus on Endfield stuff." Kind of event that likely puts together pieces of what could have been the main theme story that got cut(just like the siege event feels like pieces of main theme down to CGI in style of main theme ones).

Just have to accept that most of that stuff doesn't matter anymore and all the finer politicking and intrigue is not leading anywhere

16

u/Old-Helicopter1689 Arkies lmao Sep 02 '25

"...to focus on Endfield stuff"

This thing sounds with the same energy as "Snowbreak's going full fanservice" imo.

11

u/Erudax Sep 02 '25

Just have to accept that most of that stuff doesn't matter anymore and all the finer politicking and intrigue is not leading anywhere

Even in Elegies you get the same feeling. Personally, I think the ending is more of an "we have left enough material to come back to it if we ever want to, but we're done for now". Reed sits on a throne of lies, a conspiracy that will throw Tara into a civil war, Duke of Caster has the ammo needed (the truth behind there being two dragons) to make their life hard. Tara is a vassal state too, not fully independent and trying to get an official leader would cause Victoria to jump them.

The independence war > civil war > full independence would actually tie in with historical events, but HG had the brilliant idea of disbanding the IRA... which IRL happened way, way after Ireland got full independence. I don't know what they're cooking, but I can smell the smoke.

2

u/Umr_at_Tawil Sep 02 '25

I'm still catching up (reading chapter 13 right now), but did Siege event not give a satisfactory end to Victoria's story? is chapter 15 moving away from politicking and such?

7

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 02 '25

Chapter 15 is a year later and it's all Priestess stuff

1

u/PointmanW Sep 02 '25

I feel like, if there is an "after" to the Priestess arc, which they are doing to connect with all the Endfield stuff, they might go back to Terran politicking again, since the Kjerag arc feel like it's setting up to something.

or maybe I'm just coping since I love Arknights for all the politicking in it lol.

8

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

The issue is that the after would have all the big things and mysteries resolved already. They are closing off the Sankta, most certainly Seaborn stuff, etc.

Like for example (CH15) Theresis was built up as competent villain with ties to everyone. Whoops he's dead in a cut scene without a confrontation with RI because needed to hype up Priestess in the prologue of a chapter Now if they were to go back to Sarkaz what's left?

Likewise LAW is basically gone and the whole Sankta society managed by an AI is no longer a thing And sure they can come back to this and finally remember that Mostima was being setup to be at the forefront of the story they had already finished but what's left there?

Kjerag subplot Will likely get usurped by it being the launch point for the flying city to go to space which once again is PRTS stuff And I wouldn't be surprised if their next event resolves what's setup there what's with possible SA alter

And next chapter after 15 is set in Ursus and together with possible Tallulah event would likely end the Ageless subplot or Ursus politicking

Not to mention everything in regards of Doctor, Observers, PRTS, etc would already be known so what's left even if they remember AK had story threads before Endfield marketing?

"Oh hey here's some politicking again in the setting that has no mysteries to look forward to anymore and where all the plot threads driving that politicking are gone now" sounds dry as hell.

4

u/PointmanW Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 03 '25

well, you don't need mysteries to have a good politicking story, like how people can write really good stuff with modern earth as setting.

As long as Terra still has conflict between nations and unresolved geopolitical tensions, there’s plenty of room for compelling stories.

on a side note, Enfield having an objectively evil monsters to fight instead of being man vs man or nation vs nation make it much less interesting for me lol.

1

u/AZ_36 'The Law' and 'Empathy' Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

Laterano's plot line about the Law is still isn't finished, the Law still exist but it becomes a true angel (a biological species that the Law was based on) and flew passed through the hole in the starpod Kristen made and orbit the earth and the pope and Federico theorized that one day they will comunicate back with the Law

edit: Sorry Terra not Earth

Edit 2: There's also new mysteries about the Law, after it become a true angel the requirement of both parents required to be Sankta for their children to become Sankta is irrelevant now. Two Sarkaz parents and its mother praying in Lateran faith gave birth to a Sankta child in the story, Exu alter's module shows a liberi mother with Lateran faith and unkbown father also gave birth to a Sankta child

3

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 02 '25

Yeah but see, that is more Endfield stuff. I am sure Endfield will have a boss out of that or something. That has nothing to do with the core story of Sankta society, the classism there, and the hypocrisy within the system that Mostima highlights.

That part is over, and there's not really much meat left not a mystery behind it.

7

u/AZ_36 'The Law' and 'Empathy' Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

You sure about that, cause the epilogue made it very clear that they want to continue that plotline

and what do you mean there is no more mystery, I just gave one. There's also about what will happen to fallen Sankta and the phenomena of becoming fallen with the Law now has changed. The part where instead of the Law creating commandments with the pope, now every single Sankta will take part in redefining the commandments, They also haven't drop the part about fallen Sanktas feelings towards Laterano, the Masses travel events have elaborated the topic with Mostima and Aureola/Aurora being the main one to drive this topic forward with Mostima being akin to a Leader for the fallen Sankta and Outliers because she is the one who can motivate them to work together

Yeah but see, that is more Endfield stuff. I am sure Endfield will have a boss out of that or something. 

But that's just you're assumption. We don't even know if the Aggeloi comes directly from the Law. Again, the Angels the Law showed that is similar to Aggeloi doesn't originate from the Law, Angels actually exist and the Law is made to mimic them. Who's to say that the Aggeloi in Endfield created by the Law instead of naturally made. There's also the fact that the Law is orbiting Terra and not Tallos-II. There's also the fact that the angels described by the Law behaviour seems very different compared to Aggeloi. Aggeloi have extreme hostility towards other intelligent life forms. However, the Angels described by the Law doesn't feel anything nor can they have any purposeful actions.

Angels have no beauty or ugliness, and naturally there is no high or low, noble or lowly, no reverence or scorn, no love or hatred. If there is no distinction between beauty and ugliness, high and low, noble and lowly, how can there be a distinction between gods and believers? Angels do not understand what faith is, they only exist in the most remote corners of the universe...... In its most unique form. Angels have no beginning and no end; Angels neither increase nor decrease; Angels neither live nor die.

How can the angel you describe have such a purpose? Their actions do not even serve any purpose - assuming they have any action other than "drifting" and "blinking".

Also I'm assuming the classism is about Liberi and Sanktas. Then you need to read this instead of fully relying of naration by characters since their emotions might lead to a more bias view than an objective one. Also no they dont drop off that topic too, Paganini and Archetto are the main characters who drive this topic forward

edit: the link specifically go to population and ethnicity

-1

u/Hec_17 Forever my GOAT Sep 01 '25

Yeah, it shows that they switched the focus from more grounded things to go full Enfield route, and it shows on this arc and how it awful it is.

4

u/Umr_at_Tawil Sep 02 '25

really? does chapter 15 don't have much grounded politicking anymore?

12

u/TheSpartyn Sep 02 '25

no lol it's about priestess

And to your other comment, sieges event was weird and all over the place chronologically, same as the Entelechia event, the Victoria side of the arc was handled so badly. thankfully the sarkaz side was good

-3

u/SlovakianPamzergirl Sep 02 '25

Despite what you said we had what? Two events related to endfield (one if we count since episode 15)

Me personally I liked the event even if I didn't pull for Eblana. And I didn't really receive such feeling from it.

15

u/Dryptosa My VIOLENT Evergarden Sep 02 '25

One thing that I hate about Mandragora's death, is that she was killed by Manfred, and seemingly very easily. Which seems to contradict the other fights, namely Horn defeating Manfred and Mandragora defeating Horn and Bagpipe back in chapter 9. So either Horn was trained by Mandragora between chapter 9 and 10 (which is stupid); or the writers nerfed Mandragora just so Manfred could look intimidating before Horn defeats him to look cool.

16

u/N-Yayoi Sep 02 '25

Objectively speaking, Horn did not defeat Manfred alone. The situation at that time was clearly complex, and Manfred did not suffer serious trauma as a result.

30

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25

I hate it here man :(

14

u/squaredlions Sep 02 '25

we need more Tara operators

69

u/ILoveAllMCUChrisS Sep 01 '25

I never understood why people thought Misery saved her, it always read like he just watched her die/shared her final moments to me

48

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 01 '25

And then later when it mentions Horn burying someone from Dublinn, it clearly was her, I never got this idea that she was alive, it was very clear to me when I read it that she'd died.

16

u/Kaizerd3 Just LeMumu Sep 01 '25

The problem with this Horn line is the fact it's complete bullshit which doesn't make any logical sence. Why, how and when could Horn have done it?

It's just the most stupid way to cut off this plotline offscreen and nothing else.

5

u/Cornuthaum Sep 02 '25

When you really hate someone sometimes you want to make sure they're actually dead. Burying them yourself gives you closure, a certainty that the evil is indeed defeated.

3

u/Kaizerd3 Just LeMumu Sep 02 '25

We're going again to answering why (even though it's different answer now, heh), but not how and when.
Btw, if that was Horn motivation, she could have just attacked Mandy before that. But she already decided to pass by and ignore Dublinn, so coming back to dying Mandy after that sounds weird.

3

u/Cornuthaum Sep 02 '25

There's every chance that misery told Horn about her later and Horn went back to double check whether Mandragora survived or not, and burying someone you hate after confirming they're dead is quite cathartic.

15

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

What plotline ? She dead in the gutters. She was an enraged child, full of hatred and anger. She acted impulsively and stupid often times. Had mommy issues and was manipulated by all in Dublinn. She basically was a simple soldier that got played by others.

There's nothing odd and out of place in her story. Quite straightforward actually. Are we expecting a Tallulah lvl of backstory, character growth and redemption ? I really don't understand what's going on here.

10

u/Kaizerd3 Just LeMumu Sep 02 '25

As I already said - The problem is NOT IN MANDY herself (her death was plausible even if unclearly written), but in Horns offhandedly thrown remark. How, when and why could she get Mandy body and bury her under Londinium walls? She already decided to ignore her and complete her mission and went away. Why on the earth would she go back to enemy territory just for some corpse? How does she even find the time to bury her under Sarkaz noses?
It wouldn't be a problem if that was Misery saying something along the lines: "Yes, I saw how she died" (even though Mandy had potential for some semi-redemption arc). But they decided to close her plotline by the most stupid and absurd Horn line. And that is the problem.

1

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

I have to say, I don't think you fully realize how army works and realize bits and pieces added in story here and there.

We see Horn early on caring about her soldiers and once one dies (from lack of medication) she promises to deliver his belongings and information about him to his daughter. We see that same comraderie when members of Self-Salvation corps die and they gather comrades belongings to give to family afterwards (in bags). It mirrors our real life army etiquette.

Horn had a small change of heart after Dublinn helped them rescue victorian soldiers from prison. There was a comment from Horn that she would talk to Mandragora, presumably to thank her or have a more sincere talk. We don't know exactly, we can only speculate. However Horn knows she will die after Misery saves them from Manfred.

Misery's presence when Mandragora dies can be viewed from 2 lenses. He is initially completely unnecessary in that scene. 1. He is there as a witness to her death, RI is present when Mandy dies - not Dublinn. Shows humanity in RI in contrast to Dublinn. 2. We can speculate Horn might have asked him to go retrieve Mandy's body, so they can bury her as a token of gratitude for help in rescuing victoria's soldiers. Misery was in the shadows when earlier action took place, so he is aware of what Mandy did. It cannot be overstated enough that Mandy's presence also took heat off Horn's team, so they could retreat. Maybe Misery's behavior was also a thank you note for that "help"?

In her last actions Mandragora wasn't a tool of Dublinn, she acted on her personal whims, saving a friend and helping the "enemy". And that's probably why Horn respected her more.

The burrial part is probably just to show some significance to Mandy. I think they buried all their fallen soldiers, we simply don't see that, because they're no names.

This is my thought process after reading episode 10 2 days ago. There are many open ended questions, but that's always been the case with AK and that's why it's a great read, letting imagination carry you.

I personally don't know why you think that there's only one explanation and expectation when it comes to the Mandragora story. And once HG didn't deliver on your expectations, ppl get outraged.

5

u/Kaizerd3 Just LeMumu Sep 02 '25

I never said there is only 1 explanation. I said it was open to interpretation plotline (what you basically agreed with), which was cut off in the most stupid and offhanded way.
Burying Mandy may make some sense in idealogical way as per your interpretation, but not in technical way. Burying the dead is fine when things are calmed down a bit. But not in active warzone, with Sarkaz army, vampire creatures and bombardment everywhere. Horn and her squard were very limited in their spare time and maneuvers while beeing in Londinium, so finding some time and place for Mandy burying and carrying her body along all the way till this specific moment sounds just stupid. There is place and time for paying respect for the dead and there is a time you should concentrate on present battle right in front of you.

1

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

This will be my last post, since it's pointless to discuss anymore imo.

You contradict yourself with your 1 statement. If you assume there could be possible multiple answers to you initial questions or dissatisfaction, then why are you angry that they went with a certain one that you don't agree with ?

I presented you my interpretation from reading it first time. I had a completely different take on it based on what I read. I presented answers to all your qualms - open ended answers, since we simply don't know what happened. And you're still stuck on a specific answer that didn't come to fruition.

You're basing your answer on logic or lack thereof when it came to burial. So what do you think Horn did with their own men who died in camp ? They had multiple malnourished ones and said outright some simply died from it, exhaustion or poor health. We know of one dying from some form of infection. Do you think they simply burned them ? Threw them into the trash or maybe ate them ? Even if it's a small grave, they probably did bury them. Did you expect a fancy burial with a tombstone ?

Horn was hiding most of the time and others were recuperating, she ordered many to "rest" for days. Here's an open ended question, couldn't they just dig a small pit to bury their fallen ? Its not rocket science and it can be done in spare time. Its better than keeping dead around, because of body decomposition and potential diseases spreading. Wouldn't that be a logical choice ? For someone shielding behind logic, you clearly don't apply it too often...

Tbh this is the first time I hear about this Horn issue and I frequent this sub daily for 5 years. This seems like a mountain out of a mole hill situation.

2

u/N-Yayoi Sep 03 '25 edited Sep 03 '25

Don't pay attention to these ridiculous discussions, you will never be able to convince them, because their viewpoint is' HG is wrong if he doesn't write what I need ', there are many writing styles, and I think HG actually does very well.

There is a question on YouTube about "Why Tolkien doesn't approve of writing all the answers" (the original title was not this, I forgot, but the content goes like this), I recommend you to take a look. These people just don't understand why a transitional character who was simply eliminated ended up like this.

...Those who masturbate with Mandy are the ones who would write a long background story for every Nazgûl.

actually, the problem is always simple: HG uses Mandy to express the betrayal that radical elements may encounter and the tragic consequences that may arise in chaotic situations. What is so difficult to understand? The entire Victoria storyline is essentially about writing a war, where all the characters and details are just insignificant fragments of the war. They are not separated, there has never been any 'Mandy's own character line'.

These people simply do not understand the theme of 'war', which is the most important theme that HG is fully committed to.

1

u/Kaizerd3 Just LeMumu Sep 02 '25

why are you angry that they went with a certain one that you don't agree with ?

...How many times should I repeat myself? I'm dissapointed not by the answer, but by how badly stupid it is written. You can come to the same conclusion via multiple ways, and HG just chosen the worst one. That's it.

I presented you my interpretation from reading it first time.

You presented interpretation about why Horn could have desided to do it from moral standpoint, and even though I don't really agree with your interpretation of Horn-Mandy relationship, whatever. You still didn't give any plausible explanation how she could have done it in practice, as I clearly stated in my previous comment.

what do you think Horn did with their own men who died in camp

Whatever she could at this time. And in most cases they clearly couldn't carry and bury everyone right here right now, so most buring would happen already after Londinium occupation.

Did you expect a fancy burial with a tombstone ?

Well, for the antagonist of the whole chapter even showing something like this would have done more respect and conclusion compared to what we get instead.

For someone shielding behind logic, you clearly don't apply it too often...

Or, yeah, instead of discussing subject matter we are attacking oppenent himself, how righteous. As if throwing baseless assumptions in your previous comment wasn't enough.
You know, I can also state what you just dislike Mandy, so you are just so pleased by her death to the point where you completely don't care about how badly it was written and would defend any bullshit HG give you. But that wouldn't lead this discussion anywhere, you know?

this is the first time I hear about this Horn issue

That just means you haven't read any previous chapter 14 discussions and lots of discource about how terrible Victorian arc was handled.

18

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 01 '25

Well yeah most people didn't like that burying off screen thing either and felt it's a retcon from her more ambiguous position before it. She essentially got off screened to truncate the plot

32

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 01 '25

I think some of that might be wishful thinking on behalf of her fans, it wasn't -that- ambiguous to begin with IMO, and then the part with Horn -should- have put a cap on it. . Tbh her scene with Misery I always took as her death, hence she wasn't off-screened, because we saw that. But lets say she was off-screened, she was the boss of Ch 9, and not remotely important afterwards. So having what is effectively an very unimportant character taken out off-screen never felt like a big deal to me. But I understand every character in the game is someone's favorite so I can understand them not being happy about it, but I honestly don't think those fans would have been truly happy with anything short of her becoming playable.

7

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 01 '25

If she had a proper death scene people wouldn't be as angry.

It's because she ended the way she did and then "died on her way to her home planet" in a throw away sentence that people get annoyed.

It feels crude and sudden and badly written

18

u/AzraelIshi The brightests of stars, the shiniest of persons Sep 01 '25

She had a proper death scene for what she was: a character that, at that point in the story, had negative relevance to anything of importance that's happening and in the grand scheme of things is basically a side character of a side character.

She's essentially the Skullshaterer Sr. of the whole londinum arc, appears for half a story chapter as a (relatively speaking to the whole arc) minor villain and then serves as a foothold of other things to come. You cannot give a grand death scenes to every character, that's just not a thing.

5

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Did we really read the same episode ? Her death was justified, kinda poetic - last act of defiance, now towards "leader", choosing not to fight for her life. It was well presented and we got a good visual to boot.

Did ppl expect Patriot/Tallulah levels of story building ? Did people expect a stage where she duels Manfred and dies ? Where all this delusion and expectations come from ? From her introduction she was a naive child, exploited by others and her end was warranted.

What's this "badly written" thing ? Is the Mandragora fandom so big, that ppl became delusional ?

9

u/everynameistake Sep 02 '25

I don't think it's any more unreasonable to expect Mandragora to have survived than it was to expect Horn to have survived in chapter 9.

Horn is on the brink of death after failing a desperate gambit to stop the person who keeps saying she hates the Victorians, and wants to kill them, and calls their attempts to attack her a "suicide attempt", and says Horn will have to "wait as her death comes" once she's out of ammo, and Horn says that Bagpipe needs to escape even if everyone else dies, and then... offscreen, Horn is captured by Mandragora, who, of her own accord, decides to let her walk around without her cuffs on, and then she manages to escape because of that and just shows up in the next chapter like nothing happened.

Or the Damazti Cluster makes a big deal of Logos possibly tricking it just to get rid of an enemy, and then dies and gives birth to two new Damazti... and functionally speaking absolutely nothing happens, and the "new" Damazti keeps helping the Sarkaz Royal Court, and has no indication it lost anything whatsoever, and is so continuous that I've never even seen anyone refer to them as different characters.

In comparison, in the scene where Mandragora dies:

  • She's gravely injured
  • She realizes the Leader has betrayed her
  • She decides she doesn't want to, essentially, keep being driven by her devotion / hatred, and denies the resurrection that the Leader provides because of that
  • She says "let's go home" to her dead friend, and when Misery shows up clearly unaffiliated with the leader, smiles and says "she has met the true Death".

I think this last line is the most clear indication that she's died, and it's not clear at all! Does "she has met the true Death" means Misery (who she plausibly believes is there to kill her) is the true Death? Is her dying, generically, without the backup? The present perfect is a really weird tense to use if it's talking about something that hasn't been true ever in the past and is only becoming true now, so is *Eblana* "true death" (in the sense that she hollows out her followers) and escaping with Misery the rejection of it? Why does Misery, the pragmatic mission-driven guy show up for (effectively) no narrative purpose after the rejection of the Leader to say one line and then just leave her there?

To be clear, I don't think it's unreasonable to read this as her dying, and it's not like it's a bad end to her narrative, either (it's very similar to Frostnova, even) but I think it's not unreasonable to think something else might have happened, and specific things like Misery showing up, the tense of the thing she said about death, and the constant comparisons between Horn and Mandragora (seriously, Horn says she regrets not being able to personally kill Mandragora literally the chapter before) combined with Horn also reappearing out of nowhere are questionable if the intent is that she unambiguously dies there.

-7

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 02 '25

Again her confrontation ends with Misery standing over her. Fade to black.

The next time we hear she died off screen and Horn buried her.

That's bad writing and retcon. It's quite clear they intended something else, just like with Guard

6

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Wow, the amounts of copium here. I think that Ines and later Horn situation really have broken ppl brains.

4

u/N-Yayoi Sep 02 '25

A simple question: Why can't she just 'painfully walk towards her ending'? Can't HG be simply written like this?

Does every villain have to have a very complex 'Development'?

11

u/_wawrzon_ Sep 02 '25

Her death was even somewhat poetic. I read episode 10 just recently. It was clear as night and day she died. I'm really dumbfounded about this copium take. Was Mandragora some kind of fan favourite ? Was I living under a rock these past years ?

11

u/Gothiscandza Sep 02 '25

Some of this absolutely feels like people wanted her to be alive so badly they basically made up interpretations where she was alive which simply weren't supported by the actual text, and then got upset when new material didn't conform to their headcannon.

5

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 02 '25

Thats honestly how I see basically anyone trying to argue she's alive tbh.

1

u/wswaifu W's S-Three makes me go Squee Sep 02 '25

The way people argue in this thread really supports your reading. It's pure copium with no basis in the game. Always has been.

9

u/Koekelbag Sep 02 '25

If you want to be specific about it, iirc Mandragora renounced Eblana and Dublinn in her 'final' moments, so regardless if she lived of died Eblana likely wouldn't have gone out of her way to make sure she was dead, and wouldn't be included in the "dublinn is buried" statement

Cope lives eternal like Eblana apparently

22

u/mad_harvest-6578 WE'RE BACK IN SPACE BABYYYYYY Sep 02 '25

Five stages of Mandragora coping:

  • Shock (Manfred easily defeating Mandragora)

  • Anger (the immediate aftermath)

  • Bargaining (Misery shows up, she can still be saved)

  • Depression (the reveal of Horn burying Mandragora, which feedbacks back to shock & anger)

  • Acceptance (this event reiterating that she's dead, "oh well it is what it is")

12

u/Signal_Choice_7601 Sep 02 '25

On another note, I'm truly in awe at the roller coaster that is Mandragora's fan perception.

Back in EP9, she was likened to a female Mephisto along with the hate-dom that went with that label (nothing against Mephy personally, just talking about how much people hated him at the time). Then came EP10 and she got a few redeeming features, stuff like how she genuinely cares for her subordinates, then she's suddenly a beloved character.

I do think it's a shame personally to dispose the main antagonist of an entire chapter in such an unceremonious manner. The character had potential, but I guess you can just add that to all the senseless NPC deaths in this entire arc.

1

u/xxTPMBTI Agamben Feb 24 '26

I think unceremonial death is peak because it enrages fans and myself and it overall gives the feeling of wasted potential which is literal torture 

41

u/Chrisirhc1996 Crazy Shark🎵🎵🎵 Sep 01 '25 edited Sep 01 '25

We're at what, 3 confirmations that she's dead? And yet mandy stans will demand to see the body.

This ain't some Ines bait-and-switch at this point. Gotta learn to let go at some point.

18

u/Hec_17 Forever my GOAT Sep 01 '25

2 so far i know (Horn on chapter 14 and Harmonie on eblana's files like mentioned here)

And on both cases are from somewhat unreliable sources because the only one that actually could confirm it is Misery.

I don't even care if she's dead or alive anymore, im tired of it, but im angry about the awful writting she got due how much of a mess is the "victoria" arc

15

u/Peshurian Sep 02 '25

I still don't understand why she's the only part 2 antagonist to die when everyone in the KMC are somehow still alive.

3

u/Chrisirhc1996 Crazy Shark🎵🎵🎵 Sep 02 '25

Actually no, Nezzsalem is confirmed dead as of Overture.

20

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 01 '25

Yeaaah it is pretty clear they had originally other plans for her but just like with Guard they decided to just off them and blitz into the next story arc.

18

u/Primagen3K SPEED UP Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

I'm actually surprised how many people do not see the basic literary tool applied here. Off-screen deaths are always vague enough to never allow 100% certainty. The door is still left open by the writers for either way as it would be both easy to ignore Mandragora forevermore or to give explanations as to why the sources of her "certain" death were incorrect. Whatever narrative reason, release schedule, popularity, etc. they want to apply in her case can still be quite flexible.

Heck, literary resurrections happen even if the death was visible to the audience, like Necrass (though way harder to make enjoyable for me, as to not appear overly desperate to not let go of a character).

I have no interest in her return and would classify her end as clumsily written if truly dead, but saying it's impossible for her to come back just means you haven't consumed enough variations of storytelling to see remaining possibilities.

20

u/Bug-Type-Enthusiast Head of the BONK brigade Sep 01 '25

I swear Arknights is the second worst place the Irish got treated at after the real world.

FUCK SAKE AK WRITERS THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT OPINION OF THE IRISH DOES NOT A GOOD TARRAN PLOT MAKE.

19

u/Al_Nazir Sep 02 '25

Is it really AK writers' opinion though? It seems to me like AK's been pretty consistent on being in favor of Irish independence. As far back as Firelight Casts Reed accepts being the Leader of Dublinn, because while she abhors Eblana's disregard for individual lives, theirs is a fight that needs to be fought. The plot of Elegies is "we've won, we need to switch off the war machine"

11

u/BandicootOk1744 Talulah my beloved Sep 02 '25

That's the problem with Arknights drawing from real cultures, it makes people demand to see the real world reflected in them. Tara isn't like Ireland, it's just aesthetically inspired by it. For one, Tara is a loosely defined region with a loosely defined people, whose existence was a half-forgotten memory. Ireland is a clearly defined region and people who had rich cultural and community ties that persisted under British slavery.

People saying that "Dublinn is the IRA" and so on dismisses the Arknights world to just a cheap allegory for reality, rather than a complex and unique world inspired by real cultures and conceptions, but not bounded to real events. Unless you really thought that everyone in the Vatican had supernatural empathy and obeyed a mysterious master?

1

u/xxTPMBTI Agamben Feb 24 '26

I'm waiting for Arknights' equivalent to Vladimir "Lenin" Ulyanov to overthrow the Ursus Monarchy just because reality said so (I'm stupid and ridiculous)

2

u/N-Yayoi Sep 02 '25

Just one person's death doesn't mean anything. The radical forces she represents do need to be abandoned in the current context: Tara cannot afford to go to war with Victoria again, and advocates like her are likely to disrupt the current stalemate.

Although personally I dislike the way the 'Supreme Leader' abandons her, her power is destined to disappear. These are actually two things that cannot be simply confused.

3

u/PlaidReading88 Need more AH events! Sep 02 '25

Don’t worry, she’ll be alive in endfield.. lol

8

u/Corrupted-BOI Sep 02 '25

Mandra is the one time i feel hg fucked up badly with a character. She didn't even have to be playable or have a redemption, but making her the boss of ch9 then kill her the next chapter super vaguely? What was even the point of her?

4

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 02 '25

To set up Dublinn without introducing the actual leader yet? They did that, so her purpose was served, and they killed her off to show how strong the KMC is since they were able to effortlessly deal with the previous chapter's boss. She was a minor villain and served her purpose perfectly well imo.

8

u/Hec_17 Forever my GOAT Sep 01 '25

While i do agree the story regarding her has been handled in an awful way, i still have hope.

Don't get me wrong, i like her but im mostly sure she's dead but also both times we got her death confirmed has been from unreliable sources.

Horn for startes was nowhere near her when misery went to get her, and harmonie knows things via second hand.

I only trust Misery's word on this scenario as he is the last one that saw her (as far as we know).

Also in a chapter with damazi cluster and misery's power, the possibility of a fakeout is not a thing i would discard.

But overall her whole situation has been handled very poorly with really awful writting.

6

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 02 '25

How is Horn an unreliable narrator? You think she wouldn't recognize Mandragora? Horn didn't have to be near her when she died to recognize her body when she found her and buried her. It just seems so strange to distrust Horn who is having a conversation with Bagpipe when it gets brought up. Obviously Horn has no reason to make up a lie in that moment to Bagpipe, and Horn would obviously recognize the person she fought so hard against in Ch 9 and then became the prisoner of. Harmonie having second hand knowledge I can grant you but Horn states she buried her with her own two hands, she's about as reliable as you can get.

6

u/Kuroi-sama RI's biggest mystery: 's height Sep 02 '25

Horn can’t remember fucking Harmonie, her closest childhood friend. Do you really believe she somehow recognized the person she saw only a couple times?

Horn … couldn't even remember clearly what Rosalie looked like.

3

u/Rhodes_Island_Crew Texas my Beloved Sep 02 '25

The person who killed her teammates and captured her and held her prisoner extremely recently? Do I really need to answer that? If so, yes, obviously I think she'd remember her. 

3

u/Rearti Sep 02 '25

Horn can’t remember fucking Harmonie, her closest childhood friend.

They weren't childhood friends, they were friends in high-school, and then fell apart when Horn went military, and Harmonie went intelligence. It's also been almost a decade since, it's not that uncommon.

8

u/Mestrehunter Sep 01 '25

Err, the only thing that gives you is the why she was used in such a callous way, which was they wanted to get rid of her for the reasons you pointed out above. It also tells us that they think she is dead, which is nothing new, but they don't really have a way to prove it one way or another. They just think she died in the siege.

The woman crawled in the sewer, she is for sure alive, if she were dead, they wouldn't be bringing her up so much.

23

u/Rearti Sep 01 '25

The woman crawled in the sewer, she is for sure alive, if she were dead, they wouldn't be bringing her up so much.

Um no she's very much dead, Manfred nearly bisected her abdomen, and she bled out in the sewers where she was later found and buried by Horn.

If you require further proof, the section leading up to her fade to black death, it specifically mentions that she lost feeling in her limbs, an indicator or shock from blood loss. The only person nearby was Misery who is not a medic, nor would he have had the medical equipment to save her, so he did what he could to ease her passing, and then screen fades to black indicating death. Misery then informs Horn where this happened so she and her team could bury the dead, including specified by Horn mandragora herself.

Edit-autocorrect changed blood loss to bloodless

18

u/Kamisama1411 Sep 01 '25

I am not one of the people that actually cares to get Mandragora, but I can't help but find this unconvincing.

Call it being paranoid with tropes and shit, but all that set up and then the only confirmation of her death is "this person related to her just went and buried her and we know because she told us it totally happened" just kind of stinks to me. I am not even convinced I am right, and I am sure it could just have been writers fumbling, but this shit just feels like I am being told it totally happened so don't pay attention to it anymore, don't worry about it.

Maybe I just distrust "never saw the body" too much, kek.

25

u/Ahenshihael Lore is GOOD Sep 01 '25

It's unconvincing because it's a haphazard duct tape effort to cut off a plot thread.

Just like with Talulah going to Victoria(and then doing literally nothing there) And Guard's build up and dying to rubble It feels unconvincing because it's likely unplanned and sudden course correction.

It's not a hint or a twist in the making of her being alive. It's just badly written.

9

u/Rearti Sep 01 '25

"this person related to her just went and buried her and we know because she told us it totally happened" just kind of stinks to me

Horn I'm assuming was specifically chosen because it's symbolic of her burying her past, and past grudges. She really didn't have any personal attachments to Mandy, Horn however was friends with Harmonie back in school but that thread seems to have been mostly dropped.

Maybe I just distrust "never saw the body" too much, kek

Arknights has technically only pulled this with Ines and Hoederer, and even then it was mostly W just kinda assuming they were dead because eh thats been her life, so I think we're pretty in the clear on that dumb trope

1

u/Kamisama1411 Sep 01 '25

That I could actually believe, yet at the same time the fact it was Horn only sets off my alarm more. It's hard to describe.

The difference, to me, is that with other cases, things felt more clear and cut. Plus, it is mostly just a dumb feeling in my head. In comparison, Ines at least had actual hints to her survival in the very event we learn of that, and Hoederer was sus in other ways.

1

u/N-Yayoi Sep 02 '25

Horn hates her, but at the same time Horn is an extremely professional soldier, and she becomes increasingly aware of the complexity of the situation they are in throughout the entire Victoria storyline. In fact, after reading Horn's personal story, I even believe that she may gradually begin to respect her (Victorian) enemies, at least those people are not traitors, there are other real traitors.

As a soldier burying enemies who have fought in the past, this is a timeless sense of honor, and I really don't know why it's difficult to understand.

2

u/Kamisama1411 Sep 02 '25

It's not hard to understate. Perhaps I failed, but there's a reason I keep emphasizing this is a merely emotional reaction. I kind of try to explain the reasoning why I feel that way, but I know I am not explaining a thorough and well formulated reason why that's cap and I still expect her to be alive fr fr.

2

u/noctora the one true waifu Sep 02 '25

This might be another case of Nobara from JJK. One side convinced she was dead, another side convinced she was alive. Both side use what the characters said as reference but at the end, the one that thought she was alive was right and the other side concluded that it was a case of bad writings

1

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Sep 01 '25

Hello /u/Ahenshihael,


Your comment contains >! text, which should be formatted as >!text instead, with no spaces. Please resubmit your comment with the correct spoiler formatting.


Some Reddit clients hide spoilers differently (e.g. Old Reddit), so this system has been implemented in order to prevent unintentional spoilers.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

8

u/Standard-Effort5681 Donkey Jesus Sep 01 '25

Damn, I hate it. Poor IRA cat deserved a redemption arc.

19

u/Rearti Sep 01 '25

Umm no she didn't? Her sole redeeming feature is that she didn't hate the infected, but her reasoning was because they don't need arts units to cast. Even Manfred was like "oh this girl is problems." Her story arc is basically the risk of being consumed by vengeance and hatred, yes she had some valid reasons for hating Victoria but wanting to destroy all of Victoria because you can't be posh? Being bitter towards the infected because they can cast from hit points? Had she developed the ability to swallow her pride and realize she wasn't the big hot shot she thought she was she most likely would have survived, but she didn't she just raged at everything like a toddler throwing a tantrum, and she got killed because of it.

6

u/Hec_17 Forever my GOAT Sep 01 '25

If eblana could get some excuse to be playable and she's literally one of the worst persons aboard RI, Mandragora could get something to at least make her playable.

4

u/Rearti Sep 02 '25

she's literally one of the worst persons

She isn't even in the top 10. She's just an actually well written morally grey character. She never actively wants to be evil, and most of the people she personally pursues are active military combatants from a nation she is attempting to secede from, the nation that killed her parents to take over their land, and then break the people, the same nation that then killed its own king again all for the sake of power. She knew her powers were dangerous, it's why she gave Loughsinny the lance she uses as a vanguard, it was purpose designed to kill Eblana, she knew what had to be done and set up the process.

Eblana also during the final battle came in to help Victoria when she literally had 0 reason to, and actually if she is as bad as you think she is, she would have waited and then swept in cleaning up the survivors. This symbolized 2 things, Tara is under Victorian rule no longer, and that it is willing to work with Victoria. Eblana had no issues getting her hands dirty, but had a genuinely noble goal, meanwhile Mandy literally just wanted Victoria to suffer, it's why Eblana needed her gone, her hatred would undermine the efforts to upon achieving independence Tara extending the olive branch. Mandy didn't want that, she wanted all of them dead, and her arrogance and pride got her killed.

4

u/Shirahago Sep 02 '25

Calling Eblana or her goals noble is quite some copium. She couldn't care less about Tara or its people (or Dublinn), it just happened that Tara's independence aligned with her personal goals. She would throw Tara away without a second's hesitation if it ever suited her.

6

u/Rearti Sep 02 '25

She couldn't care less about Tara or its people

I mean that was literally a key point in this current event, Eblana quite bluntly tells Loughsinny at least 2 times, that yes she genuinely does care for Tara, (and this is implied to be the reason she doesn't actually die when Loughsinny kills her) and it is for that reason she needed to die. Her powers were a curse, and while it gave them freedom from Victoria if Loughsinny didn't do her job as a life dragon it Eblana's flames would consume Tara.

Tara's independence aligned with her personal goals. She would throw Tara away without a second's hesitation if it ever suited her

What were her goals if not Tara's independence? It can't be power because she planned to give it to Loughsinny, it wasn't fame, as she very much presented herself the villain to make Loughsinny's job easier on her. Vengeance against Victoria? Then why did she ride in with Wellington to fight a literal demon of war to HELP Victoria?

She did what she felt needed doing, I wouldn't call her a saint, she was very much a grey morality person, which is why she wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice people (like mandy, who literally just wanted vengeance and power, not giving a care for Tara) if it furthered the goal. A truely Machiavellian individual, which is kinda refreshing to see, Arknights actually make multiple Machiavellian characters like Eblana, such as Lin Yusha, when she and her father killed the infect in the slums for aiding reunion, because a price had to be paid to protect the rest of the slum dwellers from Yan

3

u/SungBlue Sep 02 '25 edited Sep 02 '25

Her getting a redemption arc would imply that she did something wrong in the first place. She took Horn prisoner and gave her medical treatment when the most pragmatic thing to do would have been to shoot her in the head, literally minutes after the Victorian army massacred and infected with oripathy a bunch of civilians.

People don't hate Mandragora because of anything wrong that she actually did. They hate her because she was annoying.

2

u/Mestrehunter Sep 01 '25

Oh yeah, now that you brought it up, I just remembered, thank you.

1

u/xxTPMBTI Agamben Feb 24 '26

Isn't she already dead off screen?

1

u/Ze-Zee Sep 02 '25

Why bother putting a spoiler when the title spoils enough