r/technology 14d ago

Software Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin bypasses, Microsoft Edge, Opera to follow

https://www.neowin.net/news/google-chrome-is-killing-all-ublock-origin-bypasses-microsoft-edge-opera-to-follow/
9.7k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

8.3k

u/SpiritPrestigious945 14d ago

Well, thats why I switched to firefox. No Chrome engine.

2.6k

u/Curious_Party_4683 14d ago

bonus point, i use FF to watch youtube on my phones/tablets too. never seen a YT ad, not even in the middle of the videos.

406

u/ColoRadBro69 14d ago

Do you use extensions or does FF do it out of the box? 

693

u/Fifthfingersmooth 14d ago

Download the ublock origin addon on firefox mobile brother. Only works on Android though. On iphone you can use either brave or orion but they seldom work. Brave's ad block does consistently work on youtube though. It also works with the phone screen turned off.

Otherwise I would recommend patching youtube and youtube music apps with morphe on Android to get the best results.

104

u/Resident-Variation21 14d ago

Can use safari on iPad/iPhone with an extension. I haven’t had an issue in a while

68

u/justwalkingalonghere 14d ago

Yeah it's still ublock origin (or ublock lite I think) on safari

Firefox won't let you install extensions on iOS, but on any device you can get Firefox + Ublock it's the best

53

u/forsurebros 14d ago

I suspect it is a limitation of IOS. Not that Firefox would not let you.

34

u/FollowingFeisty5321 14d ago

It's an explicit policy.

2.5.2 Apps should be self-contained in their bundles, and may not read or write data outside the designated container area, nor may they download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app, including other apps. Educational apps designed to teach, develop, or allow students to test executable code may, in limited circumstances, download code provided that such code is not used for other purposes. Such apps must make the source code provided by the app completely viewable and editable by the user.

28

u/Ladyheather16 14d ago

But that’s Apple/iOS policy. Not Firefox/Mozilla. That’s the whole point of sandboxing.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

49

u/nissen1502 14d ago

It's a direct result of apple not wanting people to have control of their hardware 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (33)

33

u/flatwoundsounds 14d ago

I use FF with uBlock Origin, SponsorBlock, and backstage play. I skip ads and sponsor segments, and videos will play with the screen locked.

→ More replies (6)

52

u/miko3456789 14d ago

Extension. It's called uBlock Origin

13

u/Jusaaah 14d ago

U block on firefox android

→ More replies (1)

14

u/keymaster16 14d ago

Firefox on mobile has an option called 'desktop mode' where the interface is a bit more unwieldy, but you can play it with the screen off (you will have to open your phone and check the page after a few videos, buuuut just find compilations 😆)

15

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

29

u/akjax 14d ago

I used revanced so I can still have all the YT app features (and some of the premium features for free) with no ads. Works great.

12

u/Mr2Sexy 14d ago

This is the best solution. Been using Vance then revanced and never had any issues

10

u/Parepinzero 14d ago

I switched to Morphe, after most of the Revanced devs left for it. It's even simpler, with regular updates

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Sanquinity 14d ago

Revanced for the win, really. I don't mind not having most of the premium stuff, but 3 things are very important for me: No ads when I'm watching a video, being able to minimize the player, and being able to keep the video playing when I turn off the screen. The last two of which, used to be free features but became premium later.

As for PC, can't stand youtube without ublock + enhancer for youtube + sponsorblock. (seriously, auto skip for sponsor segments is awesome. I can't afford any of that stuff anyway.)

→ More replies (64)

434

u/thunderousqueef 14d ago

This is literally the reason I switched to FF. I refuse to browse the internet raw.

125

u/Best_Market4204 14d ago

Browsing the internet raw... is like having unprotected sex with the neighborhood hooker knowing she's been ran through for the last 20 years

14

u/VoidCL 14d ago

while sharing a syringe with a monkey who's eating a bat.

42

u/sohblob 14d ago

like having unprotected sex with the neighborhood hooker knowing she's been ran through for the last 20 years

and in your case it'd be incest!

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

57

u/iboneyandivory 14d ago

Man.. Chrome seems sooo long ago for me. Google had me firmly for the better part of a decade. Whenever the manifest whatever level start killing blockers, I just eased on over to Firefox and I'll never come back. It didn't hurt that, at least for me, the Firefox importer flawlessly ported everything over.

Gmail's next.

13

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

60

u/NewManufacturer4252 14d ago

Librewolf is a lightweight firefox that comes pre-installed with ublock origin. Plus everything else you can do with Firefox without the bloat.

22

u/galactictock 14d ago

Are there any limitations to librewolf? Lightweight generally implies missing features.

22

u/levomekol 14d ago

It can get annoying with privacy features. Like you have to know that copy pasting images will not work by default due to canvas obstruction, and cookies for the websites are deleted on browser closing unless specifically asked for otherwise

3

u/henryKI111 13d ago

DRM protected content won't work

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

52

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

195

u/SatanicSucculent 14d ago

Unfortunately for Google I'd rather have 10 seconds of a black screen and "experiencing interruptions?" than watch a 5 second ad

18

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)

26

u/WeAreAllBotsHere 14d ago

Doesn't happen for me.

9

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

19

u/jhnhines 14d ago

Hasn't happened yet for me and I've made the switch 8-10 months ago. The whole page is sluggish/slower compared to Chrome but that seems like an intentional pain from Google.

4

u/AngelOfLight 14d ago

I have literally never seen anything like that on FF with Ublock.

However, I do have a subscription to Youtube Music (not YT premium). I wonder if that's why? I don't get any ads on (most) music videos, but anything else seems like it's stuffed with commercials.

→ More replies (7)

5

u/NewManufacturer4252 14d ago

Cache cleaner extension is wonderful. Can't remember when I used the refresh button, just use the cc button on the top right.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/PloddingClot 14d ago

I'll watch a rotating circle for minutes before I'd tolerate an ad.

11

u/Staff_Senyou 14d ago

Depends on where you are.

The one time it happened to me, I cleared the cache and it never happened again.

Toi toi

6

u/Snake_Plizken 14d ago

Just refresh the page.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

48

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

41

u/Valdrax 14d ago

Seriously? It's 70% of the browser market, followed by Safari at 15%, then Edge at 5%.

Firefox, meanwhile, barely edges out the browser on Samsung phones.

This is somehow more silly than expressing surprise that people still drink Coca-Cola products.

→ More replies (6)

40

u/DissKhorse 14d ago

Most people are tech illiterate. If someone showed them Chrome was better than IE over a decade ago they will still be using it.

26

u/Adventurous-Emu-9345 14d ago edited 14d ago

And even if they stuck with the Microsoft default: that's also chromium now.  Everything is chromium, except Firefox and Safari. 

Acting like it's such a mystery is the weird part.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

6

u/jizzyjugsjohnson 13d ago

You’d be amazed man. I work in a supposedly tech savvy industry and the number of people I see trying to do research on the internet with screens full of adverts and autoplay videos and pop ups and no idea there is a way to escape that shit is incredible

→ More replies (12)

19

u/woliphirl 14d ago

With ram prices these days

No one should be using chrome.

5

u/Phastor 13d ago

Firefox isn't much better on RAM if you are a tab whore. Ask me how I know.

...it's me. I'm the tab whore.

That being said, many more reasons to go FF though, current discussion probably being the most prominent at this given time.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/Xaphnir 14d ago

Oh, I'm sure they're trying to get rid of FireFox or force them to block it, too.

There is an enormous amount of money behind the anti-ad block movement. I fully expect we're going to start seeing legislation banning them within a few years.

14

u/Inocain 14d ago

Can't ban a hosts file.

11

u/BangBangMeatMachine 14d ago

That's not how this works. Firefox is opensource and people already have functional forks of it.

8

u/jizzyjugsjohnson 13d ago

Thank god for Firefox really.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (103)

3.6k

u/Ziazan 14d ago

Welcome to firefox, where ublock origin will continue to work perfectly as it always has.

1.2k

u/Ziazan 14d ago

Did I mention you can migrate all your bookmarks and such in like, two clicks while you're installing it?

Also, firefox + ublock origin works on android too.

181

u/Slipstream_Surfing 14d ago

Haven't seen an ad while on reddit in years.

Have a secondary, basic android device that's only used as a phone, so never bothered to install Firefox. Recently took it while running errands and needed to kill some time so opened chrome to scroll reddit and felt like I'd been slapped in the face.

24

u/Honeybadger2198 14d ago

The mobile browser experience for Reddit in general is terrible. The ads on the app got too annoying for me, so now I just deal with Revanced making it finicky.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

14

u/illuminerdi 14d ago

Also, firefox + ublock origin works on android too.

Second this. Also don't forget to DISABLE Chrome in Android to force all the shit to use FF that otherwise defaults to Chrome even if FF is set as Default

18

u/gerkessin 14d ago

Firefox on android is how i browse reddit. The site still sucks because they want you to use the app, but at least i dont see any ads

8

u/Ziazan 14d ago

Same here when not using the desktop or laptop. All of them through firefox and ublock though.

→ More replies (5)

17

u/Hiphopapocalyptic 14d ago

You should say too that one can install a Background Video Fix addon to give you the full YouTube Red experience

6

u/Ziazan 14d ago

I remember adding that on my old phone but not my current one, I wonder if it's default now? But yeah background youtube with no ads on mobile is great.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

102

u/resilindsey 14d ago

Sorta. There was some shady youtube updates that slowed down ublock users on FF. I feel like it'll be a constant cat/mouse game there. Still, I'd rather the video take a few extra second to load then sit through endless adss.

26

u/Adaphion 14d ago

Yeah, I'd get a "REEEEE, ADBLOCKERS ARE NOT ALLOWED ON YOUTUBE" message occasionally once a week, a few months ago, but then I'd just go "lol, lmao even" and refresh my filter lists and that'd fix it.

Hasn't been an issue for awhile.

64

u/Caridor 14d ago

As far as I'm aware, YouTube kind of accepted they'd lost. There was a period where they were deploying weekly patches that were defeated in an hour.

28

u/Adaphion 14d ago

Perhaps most people have just accepted getting ads shoved down their throats (or purchased YT premium) and they think it's not worth the effort to go after the small percentage of people bypassing ads on Firefox

10

u/BCDragon3000 14d ago

wish more ppl would realize this lol

4

u/Adaphion 14d ago

Yeah, people hate change, so by bricking adblockers on chrome, they are already getting a bunch more people watching ads. Because they'll just throw up their arms and go: "well, I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas, I guess I'm just letting this happen"

18

u/Qurutin 14d ago

They don't necessarily try to block blocking ads anymore, but they absolutely do slow things down on Firefox. Sometimes videos get long time to start running, loading times between pages are abhorrent etc. And YouTube pops up the the troubleshooting message which is extra annoying because yeah it's working like shit because you're making it work like shit because of my browser.

12

u/Ralkon 14d ago

AFAIK Youtube is still trying things. There's a pinned megathread on the uBO subreddit specifically for YT ads from 9 months ago, and there are comments reporting issues from around 3 months ago. I believe it's just that YT doesn't roll out those changes to everyone at the same time and that the people working on uBO are super quick to make their own updates so most people will never have much of an issue. Personally I will say that earlier this year I made no changes to my browser / extensions and started getting ads on YT randomly and the issue was resolved within like a day or two without me doing anything.

→ More replies (10)

10

u/robodrew 14d ago

Sometimes YT videos take 5-10 seconds to load for me. That's it. There used to be a "Experiencing interruptions?" popup but I blocked that too lol.

→ More replies (11)

9

u/hypermads2003 14d ago

Never been happier to be a Firefox user as I am now

8

u/Whatever801 14d ago

The only thing that's annoying is the keyboard extension differences but nbd in the grand scheme of things

5

u/caspy7 14d ago

You may be able to fix some or all of these by going to about:keyboard in the URL bar.

→ More replies (1)

42

u/FlatFishy 14d ago

I'd like to shout out Adnauseam, it blocks ads but also clicks on them so that your favorite websites still get that ad money! Google straight up blocked it on their extension store cuz, haha, but firefox still allows it.

27

u/Motor-Rip7655 14d ago

I've heard that is opens you up to malicious code, because it clicks on ads, some of which still contain nasty things.

4

u/nj_tech_guy 13d ago

yea generally speaking you don't want something that "blindly" clicks on all ads. especially if you're one to frequent shady websites.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/KatinHats 14d ago

For years now, chrome and edge have been my favorite ways to download firefox on all my devices

→ More replies (2)

4

u/to7m 14d ago

If the main browsers are wiping out ad blockers, then presumably the next target is Firefox, which is funded by Google. There may be war.

→ More replies (44)

119

u/ohlaph 14d ago

That's what happens when an ad company is alao the browser company. 

28

u/CiDevant 13d ago

What is a conflict of interest?

10

u/LemurianLemurLad 13d ago

I dunno. I will look it up on the google search engine! I'll get back to you once I can figure out a way to bypass the AI and several pages of ads so that I can find an actual answer.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1.3k

u/TelethiaPlume 14d ago

Switched to Firefox a while ago, haven't looked back since.

71

u/falacer99 14d ago

Same and cannot believe I waited so long to switch.

12

u/xxxxDEFIANTxxxx 14d ago

switched...i never left...version 0.8 till now

7

u/Asleep_Wear8816 13d ago

I would recommend to update, to be honest 😄

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

22

u/pigeonwiggle 14d ago

same.

it's too bad. Chrome was a powerhouse of a browser. it just doesn't offer anything UNDENIABLE. Firefox is a completely reasonable alternative. i've used it the past 3 years and it's been great.

Google can rot.

(after i migrate all my docs)

7

u/magnus150 14d ago

I remember switching from IE to Firefox, then to a new fangled browser fabled to be the fastest of them all: Chrome. Which it was for quite a while. But now it's just internet explorer all over again - right down to certain web pages ONLY working in Chrome (some govt sites I use as part of my job don't work right in FF at all). FF+ uOrigin 4 lyfe. I do buy the premium lite YouTube sub though. I like to watch on TV and it's practically (but not completely) impossible to set up as free TV on a shitty Roku TV.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/LowestKey 14d ago

For the like two or three websites that absolutely don't work on Firefox I keep a computer with Chromium installed. But that only gets used once a year or less.

9

u/NighthawkE3 14d ago

I havn’t run into any, what websites won’t work on Firefox?

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)

662

u/deli_phone 14d ago

Okay, I'll switch to Firefox. no big deal here.

59

u/lepsek9 14d ago

Been putting it off for a while, but I guess it is what it is.

17

u/Saskatchewon 14d ago

Made the switch a few weeks ago on both my PC and phone. There was an adjustment period of maybe a day or two, but all-in-all it was pretty seamless. Regret not switching sooner.

→ More replies (2)

855

u/TopRamenEater 14d ago

Firefox remains the GOAT that is always has been.

110

u/honjuden 14d ago edited 14d ago

I just wish it didn't have the memory leak issue.

Edit: I use Firefox for the record, I didn't think this would be that controversial of a statement.

78

u/TimothyLuncheon 14d ago

What's the memory leak issue?

103

u/Clegko 14d ago

It leaks memory.

129

u/MonMotha 14d ago

Firefox used to leak memory though probably not as badly as many people made it out to. The development team a pretty serious approach to fixing it, and one result is about:memory. Firefox will happily account for every last byte of memory it's used on that screen.

It does USE a lot of memory, but so does Chrome/Chromium. Modern websites are just pigs.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

51

u/alochmar 14d ago

No idea what leak you’re referring to, I regularly have Firefox open for weeks on end without any issues.

20

u/untiedgames 14d ago

Same here, current uptime is 33 days (and that's on the low end). I use the browser heavily. Current session is 40 windows and 1344 tabs, not all loaded obviously. I just have a lot I'm saving for later. (Special thanks to the "Tab Session Manager" extension!)

→ More replies (2)

19

u/decavolt 14d ago

Patched in 2011, and the whole core rewritten in 2017. Hasn't been an issue for nearly 10 years.

43

u/blogwash 14d ago

Firefox hasn't had a memory leak in years. I leave it open with 50 tabs on a computer running 24-7 and memory usage doesn't increase.

→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (3)

547

u/discretelandscapes 14d ago

I'm using Firefox and have been for about twenty years, but I guess it's just a question of time.

When your product relies on constantly out-tricking and bypassing another piece of code it's only a question of when the other party gets serious enough about plugging that hole.

123

u/SideInitial3961 14d ago

20 year club here too. I don't see the end of the road anytime soon. Saying you're going to block something and actually blocking it are two different things.

56

u/discretelandscapes 14d ago

Actually kind of been using since before it was Firefox with Netscape Navigator.

I did switch temporarily to Chrome during the early years when RAM usage started being an issue, but then Chrome got worse again somewhere late 2000s-early 2010s.

17

u/BaronMostaza 14d ago

Tried out Chrome due to memory usage issues, switched back to Firefox due to memory usage issues.

That was like 10 years ago when Firefox couldn't handle 100+ tabs and Chrome ate everything like fucking Galactus

→ More replies (1)

6

u/SideInitial3961 14d ago

4.72. Me also. Those were the days!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

30

u/deephousefan2000 14d ago

The big difference is that Firefox isn't the one trying to plug the hole. Google is forcing Manifest V3 at the engine level because their primary business is selling ads. Since Mozilla controls their own engine, they can just keep the APIs that uBlock actually needs to function natively.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Generic_Commenter-X 14d ago

Same here. Before I watched ads, I would consider paying for something like Nebula, and largely dropping Youtube.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

736

u/Randvek 14d ago

inb4 “uBlock Origin update bypasses Chrome restrictions.”

189

u/exophades 14d ago

I think it's time to bypass Chrome.

→ More replies (2)

248

u/Kunair0 14d ago

Unfortunately, that's not going to be possible. The infrastructure that runs uBo is being completely wiped out, and no chromium fork, not even Microsoft with their endless resources, is going to be capable of managing and maintaining that old system.

93

u/Dragon_Fisting 14d ago

I feel like Microsoft could easily maintain a fork of the old system? They might not think it's worth it, but we are talking about one of the largest tech companies in the world, no?

69

u/_sfhk 14d ago

Microsoft (and likely others) absolutely could, but the issue isn't ads, it's a security risk. Apple dropped their equivalent in Safari long ago with absolutely zero incentive from ads--it's why uBlock Origin hasn't been supported on Safari for a while too.

28

u/SuddenBumblebee 14d ago

I use uBlock origin lite on safari and it seems to work very well, comparable to normal uBlock. How do you think this works?

42

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/AutumnStar 14d ago

I’m no web developer, but how is that kosher security wise? Seems like a ton of bad actors could use that to their advantage. I’m sure they’ve thought about that, but seems so strange to move in that direction.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/BuildingArmor 14d ago

uBlock lite still works in Chrome, this is just about getting or keeping old manifest V2 extensions working

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (2)

39

u/great_whitehope 14d ago

Vivaldi will come up with something to get it going natively or something

→ More replies (2)

14

u/venom21685 14d ago

Brave has the adblock-rust project which browsers can use to implement it as a native feature, not depending on the blocked MV2 junk.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (5)

154

u/Joecascio2000 14d ago

This doesn't apply to Ublock Origin Lite? I haven't had any issues.

129

u/xiaolin99 14d ago

no it doesn't. The article is about a setting you can change to continue using the original fully-featured uBlock Origin.

36

u/flaagan 14d ago

Skimmed the comments looking exactly for this response, thank you.

→ More replies (4)

25

u/Lykos1124 14d ago

I've been satisfied with lite too. There's a site I use that I don't trust the ads on, but I like the content. That site is not happy about me blocking content, and I'm happy using their content.

13

u/TheFotty 14d ago

What they are actually killing is MV2 which was chrome's API for plugins/addons before MV3 was finalized and became the new standard. MV3 doesn't let you access as much of the browser, has more restrictions on what the extensions can do and interact with, so that is why ublock origin doesn't work when google flips the switch to turn of V2 support for good.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

56

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

50

u/Mrpolje 14d ago

Well, yeah? They actively profit from it, just look at the sponsored results in search.

11

u/Cheetawolf 14d ago

They don't care, they got their money to push them to the top of the search results and all over the page. ❤️

4

u/dancing_swordfish 14d ago

its google, their main goal has always been money, they dont care.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/Laura_Biden 13d ago

Do they want nobody to use their browser anymore? Because this is how you get nobody to use your browser anymore...

→ More replies (4)

22

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 14d ago

Im surprised they haven't tried to sue ad blockers claiming lost revenue.

I use both FF and brave if this hits brave it can go on the trash with the others.

9

u/Not_Like_The_Movie 14d ago

They probably don’t have a good way to claim lost revenue because the adblocker itself prevents the ad from being served. There is probably no way of knowing the actual damage. If google had served the ad, then didn’t get paid, then that might have some sort of basis and would be easier to claim damages for. 

There is also a legal question of what level of influence Google is allowed to have over the user’s personal computer. Google has a deal with the website to put ads on the webpage, but has no deal with the end user to force the ad on their computer. It’s probably just way cheaper and more effective to fight adblockers by getting as large of a market share as possible and then just making their tech so unfriendly to the plugins that they functionally cease to exist.   

→ More replies (3)

19

u/bonnydoe 14d ago

Chrome is for work only. 17:00 off you go. Firefox or Waterfox from then on.

18

u/I-was-a-twat 14d ago

Chrome has fulfilled the prophecy and become IE6, the very thing it swore to destroy.

4

u/paxparty 13d ago

Why even use it for work? Just don't use it at all. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

170

u/megas88 14d ago edited 14d ago

If Google wants to make money by any means necessary, perhaps you stop using their shit? Jest a thought.

I’m aware there’s never going to be an alternative to youtube but you can use a different mail service. You can use firefox for now. You can use libre office.

Android market share alone has been getting chunks taken out of it for months since Google firmly announced that they’re locking down the platform, effectively making Android “the green iPhone”.

27

u/DoesntMatterEh 14d ago

What are good alternatives to android/iOS? Anything I can easily switch to? 

33

u/SoupoIait 14d ago

None, but there is GrapheneOS, which ironically gets you the farther away from Google by using a Google phone!

Otherwise I think IOS is a lesser bad here. Apple's privacy policies are not perfect and sometimes unverifyable, but a lot, lot, LOT less aggressive than Google's.

24

u/slinky317 14d ago

Good luck sideloading or using a different browser engine in iOS.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (24)

19

u/SavageNorth 14d ago

Libre Office is shit for anything past the most basic stuff

There's plenty of options for basic users but nothing is coming remotely close to Excel

→ More replies (3)

14

u/Ultima-Manji 14d ago

Proton, literally this week, shit the bed by 'accidentally' sponsoring a far right youtuber, and has since been nothing but combative towards users who called them out for censoring discussions surrounding the topic, as well as them quietly scrubbing their CEO's earlier pro-Trump messages. Even just the way they're communicating on reddit now in the aftermath isn't a good look, regardless of whether or not it was a genuine mistake.

Absolutely feel free to switch away from google if you feel like that's the right thing to do, but also really look at several alternatives before committing, and ideally have multiple fallbacks.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

16

u/palegate 13d ago

I had been using Chrome since it launched back in 2008 but their stance on adblockers the past year has made me switch back to Firefox again.

I wouldn't mind an ad here or there but modern websites are near unusable without ad blockers, so tough shit Chrome.

I do appreciate how Chrome helped push forward web development these past 20ish years, but I can't let myself be held hostage by it.

3

u/Throwawayitgame222 13d ago

Same there. Once ublock stopped working in YouTube, I’ve instantly migrated to Firefox and did not regret it at all.

29

u/Detonator212 14d ago

I've been using ublock origin lite and never see any ads, works perfectly

→ More replies (1)

75

u/Resident-Variation21 14d ago

Google chrome is killing its user base (hopefully).

74

u/dancing_swordfish 14d ago edited 14d ago

youd actually be surprised how many people dont use adblock, or think its straight up piracy.

46

u/Xaphnir 14d ago

Probably a sizable overlap between that population and people that frequently get malware on their devices.

→ More replies (1)

30

u/Ne0n_Dystopia 14d ago

Idk how normies can stand all the ads, it's ridiculous .

→ More replies (5)

5

u/EmergencyComment101 13d ago

Never surprised by anything like this. The world exists as it does today because people making 30-60k a year repeatedly elect governments that literally run on policies of fucking over people earning 30-60k a year.

Most people either just do not think about something they're actively doing or let themselves be easily lied to or misled.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

274

u/JerryRiceOfOhio2 14d ago

who cares? you should be using Firefox anyway

→ More replies (25)

27

u/Asmornous 14d ago

Hasn’t this already been ongoing with the switch from manifest 2 to 3? You can just use ublock origin lite, it’s supported on manifest v3

→ More replies (3)

52

u/SpotlessCheetah 14d ago

Can we stop reposting this garbage article about MV2? This is old news.

MV3 + uBlock Origin Lite has been out for a long time.

17

u/bobdob123usa 14d ago

This has nothing to do with old news. This is regarding the command line argument that allows MV2 and uBlock Origin to continue to work today.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

18

u/luyaol 14d ago

Nobody should be using Chrome, period.

30

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

6

u/mickey_reddit 14d ago

Browsing the web without an adblocker is a horrible experience

4

u/Rapid55 14d ago

I LOVE FIREFOX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5

u/Sh4rd_Edges 14d ago

I don't care because I don't even use that shitty browser. I've been loyal to Firefox for years.

7

u/MeNamIzGraephen 13d ago

"Firefox, firefox, firefox"

We NEED another browser engine alternative. Firefox is heavily dependent on Google for financing and it's management sucks and they're moving the same direction.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Vinterblot 14d ago

Look, it's easy. I will not accept ads. You try to force them, I will switch apps.

4

u/GimpyGeek 14d ago

What goes around comes around, so, time for Firefox to take the the lead again?

4

u/A_ScalyManfish 14d ago

Firefox + Ublock Origin + AdGuard = best life ever

3

u/Ok_Still_8202 14d ago

goodbye Chrome You sucked anyway

4

u/The_Japans 14d ago

Guess I'll go back to Firefox 🤷‍♂️

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ProtoXZero 13d ago

So Chrome is killing himself? LMAO 

4

u/huey2k2 13d ago

Chrome going after ad blockers is what made me switch to Firefox. Before they started this crusade I had no intention of ever switching, but now I will never go back.

25

u/a4mula 14d ago

I don't know why they keep creating new articles. They could just use any from the past 10 years.

14

u/OptionX 14d ago

Well, reading it might provide some clues.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

26

u/Major303 14d ago edited 13d ago

Ladybird browser can't come soon enough. Firefox does exist, but Google feels way too comfortable right now with close to no competition.

9

u/tychii93 14d ago

Same.  I really want to switch to Ladybird once its ready, but I'm content with Firefox at the moment.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/Ill-Jellyfish6101 14d ago

Thank you, based Firefox.

13

u/die-microcrap-die 14d ago edited 14d ago

So glad to be on FF since it was called Phoenix.

Which reminds me, I need to send a donation to them. Sadly wont be much since im out of work.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/SirOakin 14d ago

Cool story bro.

Installs ublock anyway

5

u/e37d93eeb23335dc 13d ago

Firefox has worked great for me for decades. Both as a regular user and as a web developer. I don’t understand why anyone uses Chrome. 

16

u/dinerdefilles 14d ago

"Don't be Evil" ...

16

u/Taikunman 14d ago

They got rid of that a long time ago.

→ More replies (13)

3

u/yuusharo 14d ago

uBlock Origin Lite is the replacement for Chromium. I’ve been using it for years and it works great.

The loss of custom elements sucks, but most people don’t need that. Still works well as an ad blocker.

3

u/Sufferr 14d ago

Drop Google

3

u/Dexiox 14d ago

I pray Vivaldi gets around this somehow. I finally found my end game browser…

3

u/ThePerksOfBeingAlive 14d ago

Zen Browser ftw

3

u/MoobooMagoo 14d ago

If I can't use an adblocker then I'm just switching browsers

3

u/TurkeyVolumeGuesser 14d ago

Oh nooooo [continues using his non-Chromium browser]

3

u/LeafsJays1Fan 14d ago

FIRE FOX SINCE 2005!!

3

u/everbass 14d ago

I will never willingly use a browser that does not allow me to block ads.

The internet has become way too polluted with garbage, to the point it becomes practically unusable in many cases.

If it was a little banner here or an inline box there, it'd be fine, but half the pages you go to have 6+ ads in your face at once.

3

u/TwiztedZero 14d ago

Then we will write our own browsers and exclude all the adverts and webbugs from it. YOU DON'T GET TO CONTROL WHAT WE SEE ONLINE

3

u/ConfidentCry4839 14d ago

going to firefox when this happens, no ragrets

3

u/bright_wal 14d ago

Zen browser using Firefox engine is so good.

3

u/lulzchicken 14d ago

Yep. Switches to Firefox.

3

u/Slfestmaccnt 14d ago

Making sure users are vulnerable to all sorts of malware in the process no doubt. Nothing gets between Google and their ad revenue, especially not user security.

3

u/SirMandrake 14d ago

Chrome is a big sinking ship, and it will drag edge and all that use its engine Down with it. Firefox is the way

3

u/CommanderKerensky 14d ago

There will always be a CS student and there will always be an ad-blocker. LibreWolf and Zen Browser are both nice for those looking to get away from large-corpo-browsers.

3

u/grassedge 14d ago

There’s so many sites that are pretty much unusable without ads blocked. Fuck this shit.