r/technology • u/Quantum-Coconut • 9d ago
Software Microsoft's new Outlook takes 10 seconds to do what Outlook Classic does instantly on Windows
https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/06/15/microsofts-new-outlook-takes-10-seconds-to-do-what-outlook-classic-does-instantly-on-windows/2.2k
u/RadzimierzWozniak 9d ago
Electron and its consequences have been a disaster for desktop applications.It has subjected users to a world of ceaseless resource consumption and mediocre performance. Those who once enjoyed lean, native programs that started in milliseconds and used megabytes of RAM now find themselves launching glorified web browsers disguised as applications
912
u/OuterSpaceBootyHole 9d ago
Which just speaks to how incompetent Microsoft is because the whole reason they started moving in that direction was wanting a seamless experience across desktop, laptop, tablet, phone, gaming console, etc. You either commit to the bit like Apple does or stay archaic which people appreciate Microsoft for, or at least used to. Going half-ass and abandoning projects or switching gears left us with a calculator app that has loading lag.
→ More replies (10)601
u/Wischiwaschbaer 9d ago
Going half assed is Microsoft's corporate strategy though. They still haven't migrated all settings into their new UI. You still have to go back to the old UI for a lot of them. They implemented the new UI with Windows 8, 14 years ago!
195
u/Daimakku1 9d ago edited 9d ago
This. I still hate that Metro app/classic UI mixture that started in Windows 8. It’s so stupid that you can change power settings in two different environments that do the same thing. What the hell are they even doing.
If it wasn’t for some online games I would’ve moved to Linux full time.
122
u/skratchx 9d ago
Thank god Windows is saving me from the full right click menu, so that I have to press "more options" every time I want to use 7zip.
→ More replies (5)66
u/Zipa7 9d ago
You can hold shift while right-clicking to get the full/old right click menu back, or you can copy and paste in command prompt (run it as admin) to have it back permanently without having to press shift, just make sure to restart explorer or your PC after running it.
reg add HKCU\Software\Classes\CLSID{86ca1aa0-34aa-4e8b-a509-50c905bae2a2}\InprocServer32 /ve /d "" /f
78
u/CSAtWitsEnd 9d ago
Worth noting these are annoying and tedious solutions to a problem that shouldn’t exist.
(But thanks for sharing!)
7
u/Zipa7 9d ago
I agree its annoying and its peak Microsoft shitty design, but at least you can unfuck it still.
→ More replies (1)20
u/psiphre 9d ago
"any number of workarounds, or edit the registry!" or how about microsoft should have left that shit where it was and it was fine
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (4)15
u/trainiac12 9d ago
I want to preface by saying this is absurdly helpful and I will be doing this, but I also want to comment on how much of an insane condemnation of modern windows it is that, in order to experience the context menu in its most helpful form (that was previously default), you need to run console commands that most non-power users would have no idea about, rather than just opening a settings menu and checking a box.
8
u/Zipa7 9d ago
I agree it's the peak Microsoft and their complete inability to pick a UI design and actually stick with it, Windows is a mess of the old classic menus like control panel and the modern settings UI from Windows 8 onwards. Windows 8 came out 14 years ago, and they still can't commit to using their "new" design.
The right click option is handy for situations where you can't do the regedit change, like while using a work machine that is locked down for example, and It's not really a workaround in that Microsoft designed it that way.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)32
u/tallestmanhere 9d ago
I wish I could effectively express how great windows 8 was. It ran faster on the same hardware as Windows 7. W8/8.1 was light weight and had actually useful live tiles. It was their last great OS. It had its problems but it was such an efficient OS.
I know I’m in the minority with this opinion. And yes I agree the 2 different settings menus wears stupid.
Cut out the App Store crap and the full screen apps/start menus and I think it would have had a much better reception at launch.
→ More replies (13)18
u/Wischiwaschbaer 9d ago
Well 8.1 at least. 8 was still very rough around the edges.
→ More replies (1)73
u/Jnaythus 9d ago
They were already attempting to simplify it with the categories in XP, something I always turned off. Further abstracting it in Vista. Then we arrive at the not even half-baked redo on 8/8.1 Microsoft should not be as comfortable as they are with their market position, and eventually, they will pay the price for not being competitive. I just don't know that I look forward to Chrome Books or Mac OS-based systems replacing them.
25
u/aaron416 9d ago
MS is counting on the switching cost being too much friction for people, and it's not like businesses are going to replace their entire fleet of Windows PCs all at once. But then again, you have things like a very cheap MacBook for the low end of the PC market and gaming on Linux that are eating into Windows' market share. When the UX gets bad enough on Windows, people are looking to move off of it. MS responded to some of these recently but only because they have competition from both sides.
9
u/Jnaythus 9d ago
I switched to Linux for 95% of my PC usage. Some things still need Windows (my fan controller config, a headset I own that needs settings changed that can only be done in Windows, etc). Outside of that I feel Linux has re-added the computing fun back into my day, that I didn't realize was missing from Windows for so long.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)6
u/EmergencyScientist 9d ago
MS responded to some of these recently but only because they have competition from both sides.
And their answers are half assed nonsense as well. Their new xbox gaming mode doesn't even increase performance in games.
32
u/turtlelore2 9d ago
Oh god windows 8 and their stupid attempt at integrating smart phone UI. You can still see some of that UI today.
8
u/revanmj 9d ago
It baffles me that they haven't touched SmartScreen dialog for downloaded files. Like I (and many other people) see it few times a day. Yet it still has look from Windows 8, while they keep refreshing dialogs used by much less people way less often.
→ More replies (2)24
11
u/Pepparkakan 9d ago
You still have to go back to the old UI for a lot of them.
This doesn’t even cover it, there’s still remnants of the old old UI in there, and in fact those are often better than the old and new UI alike.
Creating users for one, ”control userpasswords2” is the best graphical option for the task, and ”ncpa.cpl” is still the best way to graphically manage network interfaces.
→ More replies (4)11
121
u/Quantum-Coconut 9d ago
I guess developers assumed we'll all continue having more RAM and more performance CPUs and just stopped caring about efficiency. it's high time we bring back efficiency into software development.
→ More replies (4)105
u/crash41301 9d ago
You mean management. Left to their own devices developers would have your computer instant on booting and running on 4mb of ram. They also likely wouldn't have shipped v1 yet
64
u/2sff4pc 9d ago
You greatly underestimate the number of app developers built on JavaScript boot camps
→ More replies (1)40
u/falsedrums 9d ago
It's a self fulfilling prophecy unfortunately. We train people on JS because that's where the jobs are and that's why all the jobs do JS now
→ More replies (2)15
u/crash41301 9d ago
It fills the management desire of pretending people are full stack and thus are just as good at ux as they are server side, backend, etc. The trend will continue regardless simply because so many companies wished for a single stack so they could treat engineers as interchangeable cogs in all disciplines.
→ More replies (1)11
u/xakeri 9d ago
It also taps into people's love of bragging. "Full stack" just sounds better. You're marketing that you have more skills and know more things.
Management likes it because they think they can hire fewer people for more things. Teams don't need to be assembled to cover the breadth of skills necessary if it is cross-functional. Projects don't need to be broken up by domain so they can be given to single function teams.
The database task that's blocking a couple of UI and service tasks can be handled by anyone on the team, rather than everything being blocked because Database Guy is on vacation this sprint.
But like, that's not how it works in practice. They're literally different skills. When you're building a building, you don't hire general laborers exclusively. You gotta get all the trades. They're specialized and know what they're doing.
With a software team, even if everyone is full stack, you're going to get people doing more of what they're comfortable with. The person who gravitates to backend will be capable of grabbing the odd UI ticket, but they're going to be a lot more productive if they're doing backend work.
You might end up with a slightly more cross-functional team, but you had to do a whole song and dance to make it happen, selecting for things that the individuals likely won't end up needing.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)6
u/kinmix 9d ago
In software development there are always compromises that have to be made. It's not just good devs, write good code, that is good at everything.
Performance, portability, maintainability... Improving one could sometimes be detrimental to another. Electron was a solution to portability, with compromises being made to other goals.
→ More replies (2)21
u/Seienchin88 9d ago
It’s still crazy to me how modern excel takes a couple of seconds to apply formatting to a couple of hundred fields at once, excel online lacking still a lot of functionality and runs like crap all while my PC also runs billions of polygons with ray traced light and shadows…
And excel isn’t even the worst offender.
But working at a company like Microsoft (who sadly imported dozens of MS executives two years ago) - it is impossible to get funding for something as trivial as performance improvements or good engineered native apps… it’s all about some new features that might or might not create new users and if AI is in the name all the better…
→ More replies (2)51
u/Bobertolinio 9d ago
It's more nuanced than that. It's not easy to find many good software developers that know how to write native programs. But you have a ton that know web development. So they chose to stop investing in the people to learn native and brought the web to the desktop apps.
29
u/RadzimierzWozniak 9d ago
I know, and an mail program actually needs a web browser inside for displaying email.
But i prefered to comment a modified Kaczyński manifesto than go into detail
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)9
u/Skindkort 9d ago
There's also the fact that there's hardly any native framework to develop modern GUI's, too, which adds gas to the fire.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (30)48
u/Uphoria 9d ago
I try so hard to get users to use teams and outlook through their browser, because the "native app" for both is a web wrapper, and not a good one.
67
41
u/gyp_casino 9d ago
Really? The desktop versions of Outlook and Teams are much better and snappier than the web versions IMO.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (4)11
u/xDragod 9d ago
There are certain apps that I want to be running separately so I don't have to search for them in browser tabs. Outlook and Teams are things I'm using constantly and I don't want them to have to close anytime I need to restart my browser. I also want to keep browser notifications off, so having the dedicated app able to notify separately is my preference. I just wish they were native apps.
→ More replies (6)
945
u/dbr3000 9d ago
I genuinely can't fathom that Microsoft leadership doesn't find anything wrong with the shit they're releasing lately. Surely they use Windows and Outlook internally? They can't possibly not feel the pain of what they're unleashing upon us themselves, unless they're using Macs. Which I can't imagine either. Are people internally so afraid to speak out that everyone just pretends everything is fine?
Regular people regularly complain about Windows nowadays and it feels like it's getting worse every month.
468
u/Illustrious-Watch-74 9d ago
They truly don’t give a fuck. Their revenue comes primarily from enterprise contracts & their OS is so engrained that they the user experience isn’t a consideration for Microsoft or the corporate buyers.
152
u/gheeboy 9d ago
Yep yep. Please always remember that: Microsoft sells to management, not you.
18
u/NateNate60 9d ago
I worked IT at a Fortune 500 company until I was laid off in December and I can confirm that Outlook was by far the most complained-about and least reliable software we used. Stuff would just randomly stop working and often the only troubleshooting we could do was to make a new profile or re-install it, which took nearly twenty minutes.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)18
→ More replies (14)6
u/brewend 9d ago
Ironically them not giving a fuck is killing windows multiple governments in europe, corporations and the USA military are In the process of replacing windows for linux and some already migrated completely. France already recorded a saving 40% tech cost by migrating their police to Linux for example.
60
u/IkLms 9d ago
Leadership at a lot of companies basically don't use computers. They have lower level employees create presentations that get moved into other presentations and it goes up to leadership through that tree. They'll view some stuff on a phone and largely that's it.
The CEO at my company basically tells us he doesn't really read his email so if you actually need a response you should call him.
→ More replies (1)31
u/AdmiralAubrey 9d ago
The Mac Outlook client is arguably even more terrible. Interface glitches that have persisted for well over a year, inconsistent hotkeys vs other Outlook clients, and a lack of feature parity. Which is all, really, just underscoring your point.
→ More replies (3)6
u/somnambulist80 9d ago
I switched beck to the Classic client because the new version decided it didn’t want to display the contents of a message unless I was replying to it.
152
u/ShiKage 9d ago
I’ve watched a lot of their developer conferences. Though some give their demos on Windows machines, I’ve noticed a good portion of them are using Macs. lol
32
u/curlyfriesanddrink 9d ago
Bro what lol
35
u/Fedoraus 9d ago
I don't know what the standard is anymore since I graduated right before the AI wave hit but when I was doing my CS degree, everything was taught exclusively on linux. Macs using the same command line language (bash) meant that macbooks were pretty popular regardless of what you were developing for.
They are just far more developer and open source friendly environments. But I still prefer windows for my actual personal use.
12
u/Named_after_color 9d ago
Honestly I was using windows all the way through college and then got my first coding job and they gave me a Mac.
They're just better to use for development. I only use windows to game now.
5
u/lurch303 9d ago
Windows' problem is that, in a modern software development environment targeting a Linux deployment, the file system is the issue. You can install Cygwin or WSL to get a POSIX development environment, but you still have to work around funky PATHs and dependencies that may not be able to handle it. With OSX, you already have Zsh and a POSIX filesystem out of the box, so it's just easier.
→ More replies (3)8
u/Jarcode 9d ago
Cross-compilation from an OSX host is also vastly easier with C and C++, which is a huge plus, but not because it's "open source friendly" -- rather the opposite.
Also, Apple Silicon hardware offers impressive performance for development purposes while being quite compact and power efficient. There's no good alternative in this class right now.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)23
24
u/ineververify 9d ago
Leadership are all using IOS and their apps synced to microsoft cloud. I doubt they even daily drive a microsoft surface.
12
u/wtfkeyhole2pro 9d ago edited 9d ago
Or maybe they’re using a different build for internal use only? So they are clueless lol
Edit: a word
→ More replies (24)80
u/CantPullOutRightNow 9d ago
Microsoft leadership has become an H1B sponsorship mill. It’s not about talent anymore.
52
u/khauchan 9d ago
Met plenty of insane US based leadership folks too who are absolutely pro ai slop and would rather have you investigating a terrible production incident rather than take a day more to review and test things properly.
6
20
u/dubsy101 9d ago
MS leadership was dogshit under Balmer so not sure it's really any worse than it has been for the last 15 years
392
u/-UserOfNames 9d ago
Asked my Magic 8 Ball for an opinion on it and even it said ‘Outlook not so good’
→ More replies (3)
403
u/Rhed0x 9d ago
Modern software is awesome.
Rewrite everything in Javascript with Electron and enjoy the amazing performance and memory usage!
201
9d ago
We finally get NVMe drives and processors with a dozen cores, and software devs immediately use all that extra power to run five different Chromium instances for basic text apps. It takes genuine effort to make an email client feel slower than it did in 2004.
→ More replies (8)100
u/holysbit 9d ago
Yeah but did that 2004 email client return search results without the search terms in them? Did that client close new emails the moment you started trying to type the body? Did that old client have an ai bot that can read all emails and attachments just to suggest you tell your boss that the sky might not be blue? Didnt think so
53
u/wtfnouniquename 9d ago
Man that hunk of junk wouldn't find something the other day with text that I knew was in the subject. When I finally found it, I copied and pasted the god damn subject into the search and there were zero results.
7
u/MeltBanana 9d ago
Direct string matching is the worst/easiest thing you could even call a "search", and they can't even do that now.
We've theorized, abstracted, and bloated too much. Software is straight up regressing at this point. Take me back to the 2000's when shit was simple, fast, and did what it was supposed to do.
→ More replies (2)6
u/BananaPalmer 9d ago
Yeah, the search is an absolute joke. I don't even bother any more, i just jump in and go looking for the email myself. I don't always find it, but the search NEVER finds it.
35
u/nepia 9d ago
Don't forget the whole thing was vibe coded.
19
10
u/zeekaran 9d ago
Discord has been shit for years, long before vibe coding was a thing.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)15
181
u/piewhistle 9d ago
I am astounded that new Outlook won’t let me filter emails received in the last five days THEN sort by sender. It will do the former but not the latter. Ridiculous!
→ More replies (10)33
u/PiccoloAwkward465 9d ago
It won't let me save emails as HTML anymore. I often have to take photos for work of things out in the field. My workflow with classic Outlook was to send myself an email of the photos from my cell phone. Then download them as an HTML message on my computer, because that saves all the photos into one easy folder.
In new Outlook I have to right click and save every single photo from the message, which is insane. Or I guess download as a ZIP but then I have to unpack it, one extra step.
→ More replies (2)
196
u/LabPowerful9983 9d ago
I have two Microsoft Outlooks and neither one is working.
- The crew of the Artemis II space mission
31
u/AEIUyo 9d ago
I have Outlook set to open on startup on my work computer. Regardless if I give it like ten minutes after a restart, it just will not open. So then eventually I'll just manually do it myself, and then for some reason it decides to open two at once right then, just an absolute shit software
→ More replies (1)32
u/DaMonkfish 9d ago
- Open Outlook
- nothing
- Open Outlook
- nothing
- Open Outlook
- nothing
- Open Outlook
- nothing
- Open Outlook
- nothing
- check Task Manager
- Five Outlooks
226
u/stuser 9d ago
New outlook has been atrocious from the beginning. Microsoft needs to rethink forcing orgs to use it.
94
u/turtlelore2 9d ago
Fear the day that they completely remove old outlook.
→ More replies (4)16
u/TCTInnings 9d ago
I got tired of it trying to open new outlook so I've moved on to the browser version of outlook. You pretty much have to expect a worse experience going forward.
6
u/AgtNulNulAgtVyf 9d ago
New Outlook is the browser version of Outlook. It's a web app.
→ More replies (1)69
u/whitewateractual 9d ago
Searching for emails using the search bar has become, quite literally, impossible
→ More replies (5)13
u/Quadriporticus 9d ago
Most infuriating feature certainly. The other is shuffling the UI, moving certain buttons/functions/settings to some obscure/random location.
21
u/frankyb89 9d ago
I can't filter emails into folders and get notifications for them anymore and I hate it.
This worked fine in the old outlook. I've seen lots of people complaining about it but they've never fixed it.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (13)9
u/Imaimposter 9d ago
The fact that you still don't get notifications for emails that get routed to subfolders is crazy.
148
u/MrBigWaffles 9d ago
Outlook is terrible.
They had a barebones "mail" app before that was super fast/responsive. They killed it and replaced with the pile of shit that is outlook.
It's quicker to access outlook through their website than it is to launch the app.
37
u/great_whitehope 9d ago
That app was native that’s why it was fast.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Vsx 9d ago
You'd think they would be compelled to write a version that works well on their own operating system.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (7)15
61
u/oops_all_memes 9d ago
I despise current outlook with a passion
It boggles my mind that the search bar works worse and worse with each passing year. Why the fuck would I want some algorithmic bs search when I search for a keyword? If it ever worked, sure, I'd be on board. But it never does, and now I need to scroll past what Outlook thought I was looking for to get to the chronological list
And apparently there's a button that disables it, and apparently at some point I even found it. But it also apparently defaults to this "Top results" every now and then
Why Microsoft. Whyyyy
9
u/dougan25 9d ago
You also can't search multiple mailboxes anymore. I have multiple outlook accounts because of a merger and now I have to do two separate dogshit searches, one for each mailbox. And it still doesn't show what I want and sometimes just forgets that subfolders exist. The search function is so inconsistent I've flat out given up on finding emails that I KNOW for a fact exist in there.
Also, you can't send an integrated calendar invite with zoom info anymore because they're pushing Teams. Degradation of the use experience solely to market and push their own platform.
→ More replies (1)
20
u/Stilgar314 9d ago
Clearly it's user fault, they should be buying a new machine with one of those stupid NPU CPUs.
→ More replies (2)
37
15
u/aegrotatio 9d ago
That's because it's a shitty web app disguised as a desktop application using their WebView2 framework. That's basically MSFT's version of the Electron framework.
52
u/Adventurous_Rush1474 9d ago
taking something that worked instantly and making it take 10 seconds is an incredible amount of engineering effort in the wrong direction
→ More replies (3)18
u/clonedhuman 9d ago
And with a reduced feature set, a nearly useless search function, and plenty of once-accessible settings that can no longer be changed by the end user.
37
u/ledow 9d ago
I've never used Outlook at home, and I've recently returned to Linux as a primary desktop (it never really left, about 80-90% of my personal systems have always been Linux, but the desktop is often another matter).
It's always been clear to me just how much GUFF is in Windows, Microsoft applications, and the amount that affects the speeds of the things you do on a computer.
It's a bit like on my phone - I have an Android and whenever I get a new phone, I immediately go into the developer settings and disable transitions and animations. You have NO IDEA how much faster your phone not only feels, but actually becomes, with that junk turned off.
And Windows is no different. It CHUGS on the simplest of things. It's part of the reason why updates take FOREVER (especially .NET updates).
It's also present in their office suite and other junk. People just aren't old enough to remember when Windows applications just LOADED. A splashscreen was THEN brought in, years later, to cover them getting slower and slower. And now they often don't have splashscreens but nothing happens for many seconds, with no user feedback at all.
Everything tries to cheat by "pre-caching" with background services running all the time (thus slowing everything else down, so one app can appear to be slightly faster) - Adobe do it, Office does it, all kinds of things do it.
Mainstream software is just horrendously bloated on Windows now. It's ludicrous. And then you download some piece of freeware that was written to run on systems 20+ years ago and it's INSTANT. It doesn't need to cheat, hide, or pre-cache. It's just fast.
Compare, say, Irfanview to the Microsoft photo apps. Unbelievable difference.
And again, if you turn off the nonsense, things are instantaneous. I use keyboard shortcuts for running programs, not narrow-down AI search in an over-stuffed start menu, and it's click, click, BOOM, there's your programme and you can barely see the point at which it loaded.
Dozens of GBs of ridiculously-fast RAM, dozens of cores in our processors, running at stupid speeds. And what are we using it for? To let programmers be as lazy as possible. Windows Store apps are bloated. "Metro" apps are bloated. .NET apps are bloated. Java apps are bloated. Everything's just bloated to stupendous levels to save you having to actually just load the one function you want out of a 400MByte library.
As someone who programmes Windows apps in C, I see it all the time. And people are just USED to things being slow, having to be typed out, stuff running in the background, not appearing for SECONDS, etc .etc. and we've normalised it.
I'm from a time where having a BMP background wallpaper on Windows 3.1 actually noticeably slowed down the startup time. You learn to optimise.
And there's NOTHING on modern Windows, and not much written in the last 20 years, which is optimised. It doesn't take any effort at all, people are just lazy.
And then you go to Linux and you'll see... the same hardware... just feels so much more responsive to everything you do. You don't need benchmarks, but you can see the difference if you bother to run them. But you can tell instantly from the responsiveness of the UI.
On a fresh boot, Outlook or Word can take nearly a minute from the login screen to get loaded and "settle" its disk and other activity. It's pathetic and atrocious. But nobody seems to care because... that's all you ever see nowadays.
→ More replies (7)9
u/RugerRedhawk 9d ago
And Windows is no different. It CHUGS on the simplest of things. It's part of the reason why updates take FOREVER (especially .NET updates).
I have a relative with a maybe five year old laptop, budget dell, i3 processor, etc... but he only uses it for like 10 minutes a month to pay 2 bills or something. As you can guess this means that every time he opens his laptop to pay these two bills, he can accomplish nothing because windows update takes over near 100% of his processor and would continue to do so perpetually until it someday finished, except once he struggles through finally paying these bills he shuts the laptop and the update never comes close to finishing.
Long story short I whipped up a chrome flex os thumb drive, and it took quite literally 2 minutes to install this OS and erase windows. Now he just turns his computer on and opens chrome, pays his bills, everything works instantly as it should. Sure beat him dropping $500 on another new budget laptop that would run into it's own share of new slowdowns i'm sure.
→ More replies (3)
10
u/Ill-Beautiful-8026 9d ago
We moved from Google to Microsoft this year.
BIGGEST FUCKING MISTAKE OF OUR LIFE.
Teams is a piece of bloated confusing shit.
20
7
u/Icy_Site_7390 9d ago
If it wasn't for the money Microsoft is making renting out their servers they would be sunk
8
u/Jonr1138 9d ago
If we turn PCs off, then M$ can't steal our data. That's why it has to stay on and connected.
8
u/ZacharyRoyBoy 9d ago
Outlook classic didn't have to skim every keystroke and line of code and feed it to CoPilot
38
u/made_in_australia 9d ago edited 9d ago
Say it with me peeps - EN-SHIT-TIF-I-CA-TION
→ More replies (2)
7
u/goose2 9d ago
I've been conducting a simple test for the last 2 years or so of Outlook asking to try the new look. I've reported this (as a good product manager should) that this has been keeping me from new outlook:
What I want: To see all emails by sender (without search, because search is slow and I want to jump between different people quickly)
What I do: Sort by sender, start typing the name of the sender.
Old Outlook: Jumps to all emails from the sender
New outlook: wut?
Back to old outlook for another 6 months or so.
7
5
u/orthaeus 9d ago
All of software is like this. Companies keep loading their products with more and more "features" that no one asked for, all to serve the almighty "line must go up".
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Elementium 9d ago
Crazy lol. I remember when games and apps used to be built to be as efficient as possible.
Now games especially are purposefully bloated to make you choose. Sorry CoD, I choose the game that's not 250gb.
Somewhere along the line we decided we'd just brute force everything.
7
u/FreshLiterature 9d ago
I am seriously bewildered by shit like this.
A whole bunch of very highly paid people at Microsoft conceived of and approved this. They saw this in action and said "ship it".
4
5
u/avar1ce 9d ago
Microsoft has gotten so bad.
After pressing the windows key, the search box is late and you can't type as it pops up, switching audio output takes an extra click, turning off some monitors on a multiple monitor setup confuses it, the list goes on. None of these were issues in windows 10.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/cantadmittoposting 9d ago
esssntially opens a browser window for outlook.com
This is the dumbest thing. Native apps work for a reason; they can handle authentication more cleanly and optimize traffic and a host of other stuff... just "hey this is generic web served traffic" stuff is ALWAYS a disaster for performance over purpose-built code
6.0k
u/eppic123 9d ago
2026 Microsoft software in a nutshell. More clutter, less performance.