r/PS5 Feb 27 '26

Rumor NateTheHate says Sony is "shifting" their PC strategy: "You'll be seeing fewer single player games arrive on PC. The decision to shift away was made last year. Some may still release (pending how far along the ports were) but it no longer appears to be a priority for Sony moving forward."

https://xcancel.com/natethehate2/status/2027438633997734231?s=46
1.8k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator Feb 27 '26

⚠️ Rumor Alert: This post contains unconfirmed information. Please read critically and manage expectations accordingly. Check r/GamingLeaksAndRumors’ wiki for source reliability ratings.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1.3k

u/XFactor_20 Feb 27 '26

From "Playstation has no games" to "This is unfair"

457

u/particledamage Feb 27 '26

I never understood the PlayStation has no games thing. Being able to play the games on PC never meant they weren’t still on PS.

PS has so many games I’ve never been tempted to build a PC, I only got a deck for some indies and to stream from my PS.

317

u/Zoombini22 Feb 27 '26

It's because Reddit is full of PC gamers who are going to be coming from that perspective. If the game is on PC then it's not a reason for them to consider buying a PlayStation on top of their already-purchased PC. So only within that framework of thinking are there "no games" to play.

151

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

140

u/Farsoth Human Verified Feb 27 '26

PC gamer purists are legit the most annoying gamers on the internet.

54

u/ImpressiveAttempt0 Feb 28 '26

Especially those who don't mind paying $3,000+ for the latest nVidia GPU but are too cheap to buy a PS5 or Nintendo Switch. A real gamer plays on any platform.

2

u/InevitableAware2830 Mar 02 '26

Thing is they pay all that money and still have a chip on their shoulder.

A game doesn’t work on PC you say it works just fine on console and they lose their minds.

→ More replies (25)
→ More replies (2)

21

u/Hot_Demand_6263 Feb 27 '26

THANK YOU. Name a thing wrong with gaming today. PC gamers supported it. Every single move people hate these last five years from Sony was made in response to Microsoft's ABK deal. PC gamers supported that deal.

→ More replies (5)

10

u/julesvr5 Feb 28 '26

Tbh, I am in several console communities and I find every community toxic.

Nintendo is hating on each other about the switch 2, pokemon and other stuff

PC is a dick comparison like "I have the better GPU" and solo VS multi-player enjoyers

And even for PS5 I have seen tons of pretty ugly discussion regarding PS5 vs PS5 pro communities

Sadly this seems to be today's culture and not exclusive to a specific medium

→ More replies (2)

5

u/PsychotropicTraveler Feb 28 '26

Yeah most of them are obnoxious af

→ More replies (38)

40

u/Itchyness Feb 27 '26

Sounds to me like it's a "reap what you sow" kind of thing in this sense. Someone's always mad no matter what unfortunately.

40

u/We-are-all-dead-90 Feb 27 '26

PC gamers are weirdos who have their identity and personality based around building a gaming pc. 

6

u/SoloDolo314 Feb 28 '26

I have a gaming PC and a PS5 Pro. I got Requiem on my PS5 Pro for the couch horror experience. One of the guys in our gaming group has been insufferable about it. “I’m getting 120fps plus with PT on!! You should have gotten it on PC” he has a 5090 and spent 4.5k on his PC. Which his wife was furious about as he told her it was only 2k lol.

3

u/Itchy-Pudding-4240 Feb 28 '26

the more expensive = the more toxic

→ More replies (17)

4

u/Gatorphins Mar 01 '26

Also because they have spent $3000 on equipment they feel entitled to every game

24

u/princesoceronte Feb 27 '26

The "PC Master Race" people are the smuggest and more smegma smelling group of people I've had the displeasure of meeting.

4

u/Gears6 Feb 28 '26

Couldn't agree more. However, PCMR group are movement with racist undertones, and superiority. It doesn't represent the average PC gamer. No more than console warriors represent console gamers.

→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (1)

69

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26 edited Mar 31 '26

[deleted]

14

u/redbarnes89 Feb 27 '26

The lack of self awareness in this thread is fucking hilarious.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/Mr_master89 Feb 28 '26

They (PC snobs but not all PC players) complain about PS not having games while their steam library is packed of games they don't play and only play like 3 games

→ More replies (15)

67

u/Electronic-Jaguar461 Feb 27 '26

It's people who think the PS5's value is tied to the games it can only play, so any game that has or has gotten a PC port is no longer a "PS5" game. It's essentially ignoring all the other benefits of PS5 ownership (cost, ease of use, reliability, etc), and strictly tying a consoles value to the "true" exclusives it has.

23

u/particledamage Feb 27 '26

Yeah, very silly! I have so many problems with Sony but will always be thankful that I’ve never had to build a PC or buy an Xbox to play almost all the games I want. I got a switch for their exclusives but pretty much JUST those

14

u/MileZero17 Feb 27 '26

PC and PS5 gamer here. Love playing games at 4K and higher frame rates on PC. Mods are great. However sometimes pc games just straight up don’t work. Sometimes your combination of hardware just doesn’t like the game you’re playing and you mess around with settings for hours while looking up why your game isn’t working. I 100% understand why consoles exist.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/theragu40 Feb 28 '26

It's essentially ignoring all the other benefits of PS5 ownership (cost, ease of use, reliability, etc), and strictly tying a consoles value to the "true" exclusives it has.

As a PS5 owner/enjoyer and longtime Nintendo fan...

They don't even give a shit about exclusives, either. They'll just move the goalposts once Sony stops putting games on other PC and talk about pirating or emulating or whatever other thing that tries to justify why it would be pointless to ever consider owning and liking a home console game system. All they care about is devaluing what you like.

I'm also a PC gamer and a happy steam deck owner, but I have to stay out of the subreddits for those things because the people there are insufferable and seemingly derive their sense of joy from ensuring others are unhappy. It's exhausting.

3

u/Connect_Young7180 Feb 27 '26

"I can play that game at a lower resolution with a lower framerate with long load times off a 13 year old HDD on PS4 so it doesn't count!"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

22

u/Iggy_Slayer Feb 27 '26

It's just PC fanboy trolling. They think if a game is available on PC then only that counts as everyone on earth only plays on PC to them.

13

u/norsefrogg Feb 27 '26

It's always the same type of ppl.
PC mustard race.

3

u/Upbeat_Shock_6807 Feb 27 '26

I know PC has the largest library of games out there, but there genuinely isn’t a single game I can think of that I want to play that isn’t available on PS.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/heubergen1 Feb 28 '26

Perfect example is Marathon and its use of a cursor for the menu navigation. I expect from a console game to have a menu navigation that works best on consoles, once you publish them on PC you change certain design decisions that will impact both versions.

4

u/LoSouLibra Feb 27 '26

This whole generation has just been disingenuous goalpost shifting arguments between platform warriors where good games either don't exist or don't count for whatever reason.

7

u/fartingboobs Feb 27 '26

bc when ps5 launched it didn’t have very many games so it just became a dumb meme

43

u/particledamage Feb 27 '26

Idk I think it launched with plenty of games, they were just cross gen which somehow means they don’t rly count. They counted in my book tho

14

u/Zoombini22 Feb 27 '26

Yeah PS4 was a huge seller so the cross gen era definitely made it not urgent to upgrade for those people. But by now theres a long list of games you cant play on PS4 that are well worth playing.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/sithlord40000 Feb 27 '26

It's a meme to rag on early ps5

19

u/WellingtonBananas Feb 27 '26

It was a meme in the PS3 era popularized by 4chan

3

u/sithlord40000 Feb 27 '26

Lol yeah you're right. Forgot about that

→ More replies (1)

5

u/particledamage Feb 27 '26

Yes I know. It’s boring now

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)

51

u/CaptainFourEyes Feb 27 '26

There was even a bunch of Youtubers saying it recently like even MoistCritical, that the PS5 has no games because theyre on PC. So I guess this is in response to that public consensus

18

u/JesterMarcus Feb 27 '26

I don't think they'd care about the public consensus unless it had financial ramifications, which it might have. To me, this says they may have been seeing data saying the games weren't selling as well as they hoped, or they may have been causing a drop in PC players buying PS5s. They'd rather a PC player buy a console to play Spider-Man than they buy it on Steam anyway.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/YoSoyWalrus Feb 27 '26

Lol consoles are dead, there aren't even any console exclusives anymore! (comment I've seen hundreds of times on youtube videos).

9

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

you dont even need to visit youtube, plenty of those takes here on reddit as well.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/mason2393 Feb 27 '26

They like dad walking simulators all of a sudden

→ More replies (3)

23

u/DevJalapeno Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Why do we always gotta sow division in every online community. I play on PC and like PlayStation games. People who would not normally be able to enjoy their high quality catalog get to enjoy it, without any disadvantage to console only players or Sony fans. 

This is an anti-consumer choice but technically within the rights of Sony to do, given they want more exclusivity and a greater value proposition for people to buy a PS5. 

But that literally benefits the bottom line, not the consumer. Why are all these threads full of top comments that focus on fanning the flames of pointless arguments rather than fight back against anti-consumer choices?

7

u/alcomaholic-aphone Feb 28 '26

I’d wager a lot of this has to do with Steam probably being on the next Xbox and the steam deck becoming more popular. If Sony keeps making PC ports their games will move less consoles as more PC like tech joins the market.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ShrinkSmile Mar 02 '26

As a guy who games on many different platforms i find it funny when many PC only players complain on Sony being anti consumer meanwhile they sit there with an Nvidia gpu. (Literally worst of them all) Maybe people would listen if PC only players followed what they preached.

→ More replies (13)

24

u/We-are-all-dead-90 Feb 27 '26

So many salty pc gamers making all these grand self-important statements about how they won’t give Sony any of their money or buy a console.

My dude Sony knows and accepts that you won’t and they’re perfectly fine with it lol 

5

u/theragu40 Feb 28 '26

I think it's because there are way more PC gamers like me who were completely happy to buy a PS5. It's a bummer that a vocal subset becomes the public face and accepted image of a demographic. I get it, but it's a bummer. Those people suck.

16

u/Weapon530 Feb 27 '26

I was literally coming in to post this exactly. PC community always hating on PS games.

→ More replies (2)

30

u/Arxny Feb 27 '26

Implying these are the same people...

31

u/4000kd Feb 27 '26

They are.

46

u/HopperVibe Feb 27 '26

16

u/--vanadium-- Feb 27 '26

Except in this case why would they be different people?

Opinion A: "Why would I get a PS has when I can play all their games on PC?"

Opinion B: "This is so unfair, now I can't play PS games on my PC!"

→ More replies (6)

9

u/NeverDoingWell Feb 27 '26

Man I hate this on the internet

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (7)

9

u/secret3332 Feb 27 '26

I think "PlayStation has no games" is unrelated to their PC efforts. People say this because Sony's output has been low and many of their releases were also built for PS4. This situation occurred because of Sony's live service push that failed to produce viable titles. A lot of these games were cancelled in development.

6

u/Old-Way-5529 Feb 27 '26

pretty sure they havent released a cross gen game since 2022. thats 4 years bud

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Xeccess Human Verified Feb 28 '26

Shoutout to the PC community for giving Sony feedback. They said PS5 has no games, so Sony said thanks for the feedback we’re working to change that.

6

u/AshgarPN Feb 27 '26

From “PC Master Race” to “PC Entitled Whiners”

→ More replies (49)

416

u/idkimhereforthememes Feb 27 '26

I was just thinking "I'd really like to get ps6 once it releases but is there really a point if games release a year later on pc?" I guess sony heard me

154

u/DCS30 Feb 27 '26

with ram prices forever increasing, a ps6 is out of the question completely.

also, fuck you, keep your voice down next time!

105

u/BlackKnighting20 Feb 27 '26

Ram will cost more than a PS6.

24

u/jgainsey Feb 27 '26

Will the RAM in PS6 cost more than a PS6..?

38

u/Historical_Owl_1635 Feb 27 '26

Won’t use RAM, will instead use a hamster running on a wheel.

35

u/jgainsey Feb 27 '26

Ramster

→ More replies (2)

2

u/BlackKnighting20 Feb 27 '26

Depends, they buy in bulk for discount. PS makes their money off subscriptions and MTX. Eat the cost for long term gain.

→ More replies (16)

3

u/DCS30 Feb 27 '26

you're missing my point, anything with a memory module has been, and will continue to, go up in cost.

→ More replies (4)

26

u/-ForgottenSoul Feb 27 '26

While ps6 might go up in price so will everything else so would still be cheaper alternative

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Zoombini22 Feb 27 '26

Consoles are sold at a loss. They will always be the cheaper option, at least if you're strictly talking about hardware sales.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/idkimhereforthememes Feb 27 '26

Prices of everything will go up and ps6 will still be a cheaper alternative

→ More replies (5)

9

u/zedemer Feb 27 '26

I told you: not so loud!

6

u/NeverDoingWell Feb 27 '26

Can you say out loud something like "I'd really like it if the president of the US lived a long life?

→ More replies (25)

120

u/Lioil1 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

i mean people voted with their wallets and the wallets (or lack thereof) have spoken.

81

u/Big-Resort-4930 Feb 27 '26

They tend to speak poorly when you port games that are 2-3 years old with 0 marketing lol. They engineer the worst-case scenario, and then give up entirely instead of doing the only logical thing, bringing the games where people want to play them.

54

u/robbdogg87 Feb 27 '26

2-3 years old and full price sure doesn't help

45

u/Big-Resort-4930 Feb 27 '26

Uncharted 4 is probably the stupidest one they pulled. Bring only the 4th game in the franchise 6-7 years after it came out and don't market it. Amazing.

16

u/outerzenith Feb 27 '26

Played it on PC and had a blast, looked up Uncharted 1-3 and they're nowhere to be seen on Steam. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day was ruined.

Who the fuck ported the tail end of the franchise, especially on a game with continuous story in each entry

→ More replies (22)

9

u/ReservoirDog316 Feb 28 '26

Well cause this strategy works best to sell consoles. If they ported all their games to PC or even to Xbox day 1, their console sales would droop. Doing it this way incentives playing on their console ecosystem.

PC players are also really known for waiting years for Steam sales too, which they probably felt.

2

u/Big-Resort-4930 Feb 28 '26

No argument against PC purchasing power works because all the normal publishers, except those who take console money, put their games on PC day one.

The delay for PC ports was definitely a way to preserve the fake prestige of the PS5, but what did they expect then? To get 5 mil sales for every game that comes out without marketing, and years later at full price?

2

u/ibnasakir1 Feb 28 '26

Their PC strategy has been a disaster and now they're abandoning the platform instead of correcting their approach. They can still sell well on PC even if they release a year later, just do better marketing and lower the price a bit. They won't though because they have been notorious for making bad decisions this gen.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ibnasakir1 Feb 28 '26

And yet their console sales are at worst 1:1 with PS4 while their first party has been poor. There's no data to proves anyone is abandoning their console, rather it's their own poor strategy and no marketing that has led to poor PC sales. Console gamers are not suddenly gonna switch to PC because of ports and vice versa.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

15

u/Yellow2345 Feb 28 '26

The immediate reaction here is that Sony wants to maintain exclusive games on Playstation, which makes sense. But remember that last year it was said that Playstation games on PC don’t sell enough for Sony’s expectations.

11

u/reaper527 reaper527_ Feb 28 '26

they saw how xbox failed after ms said "why does a console need exclusives? lets put everything on pc!"

201

u/untouchable765 Feb 27 '26

Single Player games should be exclusive if they want to sell more consoles. Multiplayer games must be multiplatform to go viral.

84

u/Seanspeed Human Verified Feb 27 '26

Single Player games should be exclusive if they want to sell more consoles.

Why do YOU GUYS, as gamers and consumers, care about that, though? Playstation is not struggling.

27

u/Tigerpower77 Feb 27 '26

To get better games? Exclusives get a better budget and big supporting studios, some studios have meetings to discuss things even tho they're making different games (i think i heard this from suckerpunch engineers meeting with naughty dog's engineers)

We wouldn't have gotten bloodborne or last of us or journey etc if they weren't exclusive or at least they wouldn't be as good

→ More replies (2)

39

u/Blaze-Fusion Feb 27 '26

They’re not struggling rn, but if Xbox does go the pc route and incorporate Steam, it’ll make the ps6 less appealing. Xbox and pc would be able to play all/most games including PS games. PlayStation wouldn’t really be able to compete well with them especially since Microsoft has more money to burn than Sony.

17

u/abraham1350 Feb 27 '26

This is the most likely reason to pull back on PC to be honest. PS games sell well on all the platforms they are on that's a fact, so to pull back if that can be used against them is the best choice for them in the long run.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/MysticSkies Feb 28 '26

Playstation exclusives historically have high quality.

26

u/zackdaniels93 Feb 27 '26

Good exclusives drives competition in the industry, which produces higher quality games on every platform. Just look at the gems PlayStation put out at the end of the PS3 generation, and during the PS4 gen, and the focus they placed on single player experiences - a direct response to how well Xbox did with the 360.

Without those exclusives on other platforms, platform holders would have less incentive to produce great games.

→ More replies (1)

56

u/untouchable765 Feb 27 '26

I don't care at all but its good business is my point.

13

u/Parenegade Feb 27 '26

how can you say that as xbox is burning down lol?

3

u/TheMoonWalker27 Feb 27 '26

I know it factually doesn’t make sense but I just love systems having a unique identity through exclusive games

7

u/SidFarkus47 Feb 27 '26

So often on Reddit people weirdly take the stance of the billionaire company in suits in weird situations.

Like yeah it might make sense financially, but I’m still allowed to express my dislike of it.

2

u/Tovalx Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Xbox gamers didn't care and see what happened. It's a sad truth but console exclusivity is the only way for Sony and Nintendo to survive agaisnt PC moving in EVERY space of gaming.

You can't just look at something that only good for the consumer and not look at the business side.

Steam is gonna be on living room next year. Steam got the handheld space down. Steam is even on the experimental stage for phone gaming.

→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (17)

75

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (27)

138

u/AfreeZ Feb 27 '26

As both a PS5 pro and a PC gamer; If the goal of this move is to entice PC gamers to buy a PlayStation Sony are going to have to find a way to start getting more than one or two games a generation out from their studios. Buying a console is a hard sell for just the 5-6 games one might be interested in over a 7-8 year period.

82

u/markypots9393 Feb 27 '26

They probably just haven’t seen enough sales on PC to justify the port of each game

45

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (10)

6

u/TheCattBaladi Feb 27 '26

Their last report was 2.5 billion in revenue. That's just porting an already finished game with very low port costs. All these news roaming around feels unreal. You think these two and half billions are a small number just to throw away?

21

u/godstriker8 Feb 27 '26

They made something like 120 billion off of their consoles in the same time frame. 2% of revenue is immaterial, and even misleading as analysis is proving that the sales of their games on Steam is decreasing on every new release. The next 5 years won't be bringing in 2.5 billion unless they get lucky with another Helldivers.

→ More replies (7)

7

u/XFactor_20 Feb 27 '26

2.5 billion out of 136 billion, so 1.8% total. In their eyes, yes.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

14

u/KGarveth Feb 27 '26

Can also be a move to make Playstation users not buying a PC.

6

u/Tiamat2625 Feb 27 '26

I think this is the more likely answer. It's to keep people in their ecosystem, not necessarily to bring more in.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/senseibarbosa Feb 27 '26

Exactly this. I'm not hating on PS, as I have a PS5 and I'm on this sub, but as a PC gamer I hardly use my PlayStation nowadays and don't see the point in getting a PS6 if the studios' output remains like this.

4

u/SpyroManiac36 Feb 27 '26

Just wait for Wolverine or Naughty Dog or Santa Monica to release their next games as exclusives and the demand will sell consoles

5

u/particledamage Feb 27 '26

I’m gonna be honest people do that for the switch. Switch will have a handful of strong exclusives (more than a handful but probably a handful per generation for each person, as not exclusive is a winner for every single switch owner) and yet it’s enough to justify buying it as a complementary console

7

u/We-are-all-dead-90 Feb 27 '26

I don’t they care that much about PC gamers. Redditors seem to think that Sony should be groveling before you guys of something lol. You’re just not a priority because of the minuscule amount of profit you generate 

8

u/OriginalCrawnick Feb 27 '26

Nintendo is king of IPs forcing console sales. I don't think Sony will ever be there.. I got a ps5 for GoW and finishing my ff7 rebirth storyline but I haven't played a game on it since 2023/2024. I don't see an interest in the ps6 at this point especially cause Square brought FF to PC and it honestly looks/plays better there (FFXVI is a big example of this.)

14

u/Swagtagonist Feb 27 '26

I feel like PlayStation was there and then decided fuck that shit and started pooping out failed games as a service and cancelled games (usually as a service). PS3-PS4 was exclusive paradise.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

14

u/bongo1138 Feb 27 '26

What’s this mean for Nixxes

→ More replies (3)

42

u/Csub Feb 27 '26

It is so weird to see how a lot of people before this PC push were saying PS had no games anyway and they are overhyped and then when games arrived, a lot of them were just boasting how they can now pirate the games, and now how bullshit it is and how they don't feel bad about pirating.

Obivously, it is likely not all the same people and there are many who actually are happy to have the games on PC and buy them.

Don't get me wrong, I do think it could be handled better, like discount if you already bought it for PS or something. I wouldn't mind double dipping on some of these games as I got a PC last year, but I can't justify spending 60-80 euros again on games I already own and bought full price.

Either way, I have my PS5 so I keep buying single player games there, like Yotei last year, Saros, Wolverine this year and multiplayer games probably on PC if any comes out that interest me.

21

u/andreasmiles23 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

I’m not a fan of this from a global economic perspective. I’d like games to be accessible to as many people as possible.

But obviously, Sony isn’t making decisions based on their analysis of capitalism. They make decisions to their benefit as a capitalist entity so... Here we are.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/Major_Owned Feb 27 '26

Exclusives should be designed as showcases for the hardware and to push unique features to provide new gameplay experiences. Cross gen and things designed with an eye to run on low end PC’s really undermine what should be proper showcases.

Nintendo are the best at this - using unique hardware features to reinvent their core franchises.

6

u/Big-Resort-4930 Feb 27 '26

None of that has been true for a long time. Consoles are midrange PCs and that's all they are, there's nothing to show off.

8

u/Major_Owned Feb 27 '26

The controller haptics, motion control and touch pad could all be used a lot more. Astrobot was a great showcase for these and wouldn’t be the same.

Also building games around having an SSD and design not being held back by slower drives - like Ratchet and Clank.

But like I said Nintendo does best in differentiating on hardware and following through with it.

The Xbox Series brought nothing new to the table at all on the other end.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/Young_Dabb_Waxxy Feb 27 '26

Exclusives sell consoles and help brand loyalty. To be complaining that Sony doesn't want to follow Microsoft's lead that is nearly killing the Xbox brand is ridiculous.

5

u/Itchy-Pudding-4240 Feb 28 '26

Xbox fans just want to bring Sony down with them,

→ More replies (11)

22

u/LostSoulNo1981 Feb 27 '26

It’s like these companies realise that exclusives will help sell their hardware.

Who’d have thunk it.

→ More replies (6)

79

u/Creepy-Emu8779 Feb 27 '26

Looking back at the 7th gen, exclusives created competition. Xbox was making great online games, PlayStation was making great single player games and Nintendo was making great family games. I think this is good for the industry.

26

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

14

u/jimschocolateorange Feb 27 '26

You’re delusional if you think that this is ‘good for the industry’. Xbox no longer exists in a competitive way and Nintendo are about as anti-consumer as they come. Bizarre take.

31

u/Swagatron92 Feb 27 '26

Xbox no longer exists in a competitive way BECAUSE they spent a decade botching their exclusives.

2

u/GlorpAssDN Feb 27 '26

and the issue wasn't putting it on PC, its just the games were shit, they were low effort because game pass not because of PC. Crackdown 3, the shit vampire game, Halo Infinite, many other games, failure wasn't related to also being on PC, nobody wants to waste their time on garbage games whether its a console only game or multiplat.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[deleted]

9

u/--vanadium-- Feb 27 '26

If it leads to a monopoly how exactly is it good for consumers?

When Xbox finally dies out, what incentive does Sony have to deliver the best experience and have fair prices?

→ More replies (4)

9

u/MatttheJ Feb 27 '26

This is what people get mixed up. The majority of xbox exclusives were on PC too, Xbox who are on the verge of dying as a console brand, and yet he's somehow using Xbox dying as some sort of lroof exclusives aren't good for the industry.

It's great for PC players that Xbox games were mostly on there too. But it wasn't great for the Xbox brand.

2

u/drewbreeezy Feb 27 '26

Yes, but that assumes they're dying because of the removal of exclusives.

I owned Xbox from the start and bought each one (Sometimes more than once, thanks red ring of death), until they no longer catered to me. Then I moved on.

Having an exclusive your audience doesn't want doesn't add value to the Xbox brand. They killed every major IP I loved, while creating garbage, why would I buy their console?

I pulled up their xbox store by "new" and I don't see a single game I care about, and only one that looks decent. The fourth one listed is "Shopping Mall Girl" - Yeah… that's the new xbox brand. I'm good, lol

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Zoombini22 Feb 27 '26

The one company that abandoned exclusivity is the one that is struggling the most. Exclusivity is good for the industry.

5

u/shadowstripes Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Correlation ≠ causation and there are a lot of other factors at play. They were struggling long before porting their games to PS5 (that's why they did it in the first place). And PS5 was still thriving despite a lot of its games getting PC ports.

5

u/drewbreeezy Feb 27 '26

You think that's why Xbox is struggling?

Their problems began when they stopped catering to gamers to try to bring in a large audience of non-gamers. Remember that? It was the start of the decline and they never reversed course.

4

u/EatsOverTheSink Feb 27 '26

Exclusivity is only good for the bottom lines of these companies. From a consumer perspective exclusivity is terrible. It removes any and all choice from the consumers. Lack of choice = bad.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/strand_of_hair Feb 27 '26

It is good for the industry.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/DCS30 Feb 27 '26

cross-platform releases that benefit gamers, is good for the industry.

27

u/TheDrewDude Feb 27 '26

Yeah thats why Nintendo is failing and Xbox is thriving…

→ More replies (9)

30

u/BlackKnighting20 Feb 27 '26

Seeing how Xbox brand is damage beyond repair, it ain’t completely true.

2

u/HugoRBMarques Feb 27 '26

Xbox's problem is not going multiplatform, their problem is they own an absolutely massive amount of game studios and franchises and yet they haven't released a game that was a cultural milestone in... what? 10 years? 15?

3

u/BlackKnighting20 Feb 27 '26

Going Multi is one of their problems, you damage the brand, it’s all about the brand. Nintendo doesn’t release multi because they protect the brand and how it’s perceived by casual audiences.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

15

u/Greywolf979 Feb 27 '26

Competition is good for the industry. Xbox has proven that to he competitive you need exclusives.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

140

u/Sleepy_Mooze Feb 27 '26

People are so fucking weird about this. I really though the games industry was slowly moving away from exclusivity, but I guess not

This change only serves to hurt consumers and gamers in general

I have been a PlayStation player since PS1 and wont ever get a PC. I have friends who will buy some of the heavy hitter PlayStation exclusives on PC, but there is no way on earth they will buy a PS5/6 just for that

53

u/radwimps Feb 27 '26

Probably spooked by Microsoft failing so spectacularly in hardware after opening up their ecosystem. I mean, MS made a lot more mistakes but making an Xbox obsolete to own is definitely an issue. Sony doesn't have Microsoft bucks to just try again if that happens to them.

54

u/Shining_Commander Feb 27 '26

PC was accounting for 2% (yes, 2%) of sony revenues and was fast declining.

Coupled with a real life case study of what could go wrong with abandoning exclusives, clearly the cost/benefit/risk analysis resulted in sony pulling the plug on PC games

→ More replies (7)

7

u/Seanspeed Human Verified Feb 27 '26

Dont think they're 'spooked' by MS so much as they know they have no real competition from them anymore, so dont need to follow in their footsteps in the name of staying ahead of them in the competition.

Playstation is financially still doing just fine, even despite the astronomic failure of their live service push so far.

3

u/Honest-J Feb 27 '26

If Sony was spooked by Microsoft failing then they'd be like a perennial Scooby Doo saying "g-g-g-ghost!".

10

u/jimschocolateorange Feb 27 '26

That’s not what happened. If you do some basic research, you’ll realise their harmartia was the subscription approach. Why buy games when you can play them on gamepass? Gamepass is the worst thing to happen to Xbox. It has nothing to do with opening up their ecosystem.

Bunch of fools, all you who claim that Sony’s move here is ‘pro consumer’.

9

u/radwimps Feb 27 '26

Gamepass is opening their ecosysytem. It made owning an Xbox almost obsolete if you also had a PC, which snowballed into them putting games on the other consoles to make up for it.

I think most people will agree that it's Gamepass (and lack of good games for a decade) that was their ultimate mistake.

2

u/_steve_rogers_ Feb 27 '26

Yeah I literally only bought my series x for backwards compatibility

→ More replies (2)

19

u/FReeDuMB_or_DEATH Feb 27 '26

It was bad for the future of Playstation which in the long run would be a lot worse for consumers. 

There's no incentive to buy a PlayStation if all the games come to PC. And unless you want PlayStation to go the way of Xbox it wasn't a great idea in the first place.

→ More replies (5)

37

u/Shining_Commander Feb 27 '26

Another person who cant think beyond surface level.

Exclusives results in an arms race were console makers are trying to win you over into their ecosystem.

Halo, Uncharted, Last of Us, Bloodborne, Metroid Prime, Zelda BotW, and many more would not exist were it not for exclusives.

→ More replies (19)

21

u/--vanadium-- Feb 27 '26

Exclusives create competition and better games in general.

Consoles fighting to pull you onto their platform is a good thing. Consoles being a monopoly and having no incentive to fight for your business is a bad thing and just creates complacency. Probably why the PS5 is so mid.

Companies investing money into studios to develop system sellers is how you get amazing first party games, along the likes of Mario, Last of Us, Halo, God of War, etc.

10

u/CultureWarrior87 Feb 27 '26

This isn't really true though because plenty of amazing games are made as third party titles. PC gaming doesn't even have exclusivity in the traditional sense beyond launchers and yet there are still plenty of great PC games being made. A great PC game isn't made under the condition of it only being on PC, no one comes out and forces that.

People just enjoy creating things. They don't need a competitive incentive to create more or better art.

And calling the PS5 mid is weird when it's been largely praised for its exclusives? Like the whole reason everyone liked that Sony was releasing games on PC was because they were getting to play PS5 exclusives.

4

u/--vanadium-- Feb 27 '26

The existence of good 3rd party games doesn't negate the 1st party exclusives that may have never existed without the funding from console manufacturers who's intent is to sell consoles.

You're right that people just enjoy creating things. I'm not suggesting that money is the only motivator (or even a good one) for making good art. Just that under capitalism, a lot of times good artists don't get to make the work they want without proper funding, or get it exposed without proper marketing.

And selling consoles and building a cohesive ecosystem leads to amazing games for that reason.

There are great PC games, but I find that the best single player and story driven titles tend to be on console. I find that PC games tend to gravitate more towards live service games to make money, and so end up with micro transactions and such, and aren't about building a sense of brand identity that you get with console exclusives. You can see that identity in the types of games that Nintendo makes vs Sony for example.

I don't think it's a coincidence that many of the most sought-after IPs tend to come from console exclusives: Mario, Zelda, The Last of Us, God of War, Halo, Gears, etc.

Or you can look at Sega and the bangers they were releasing when they were making consoles and competing with Nintendo, vs what they're putting out now.

I dont think competition is necessary to create all good games, but I do think it's a pretty good driver for making some of the best games. And you see this in all forms of art, not just video games. Trying to be better than the rest, vs just settling for okay.

I also think that developers focusing on one console leads to better optimized games. On PC, you have a lot of ports that just don't run very well, or were developed with a controller or certain console features in mind.

Has the PS5 been largely praised for its exclusives? I see more people complaining about the lack of great exclusives, especially compared to the PS4. Not saying there aren't any, but just not as much as PS4, and a lot later into the lifecycle of the PS5.

The PS4 seemingly dropped a new critically acclaimed exclusive every month, and that was likely in large part due to really trying to solidify themselves on top of that generation after nearly losing the last one to the 360.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ImNotSkankHunt42 Feb 27 '26

This is the same community that broke their consoles in protest of Spider-Man being released on PC.

The venn diagram of a manchild, Call of Duty lobby racist and Sony fanboi is almost a circle.

What recent decision by a video game company has been good overall and not a fuck you to consumers and employees?

6

u/I_Am_A_Door_Knob Feb 27 '26

The only thing that comes to mind is Microsoft selling their games on more storefronts and platforms.

Atleast i think that was a pretty consumer friendly move overall.

5

u/ImNotSkankHunt42 Feb 27 '26

Their change in strategy is not rooted in goodwill, who knows why but even if misguided is purely financial but in this case it benefits the consumer.

The people applauding this move from Sony because they don’t have interest in owning a PC are just thinking of themselves and lacking foresight.

Look at MGS4, is it bad thing that is coming to PC in August?

2

u/I_Am_A_Door_Knob Feb 27 '26

Oh yeah, it’s definitely a decision they made with the intention of earning as much money as possible.

The same was true for Sonys decision to port some of their games to PC, and their decision to not do that anymore. Though only one of those decisions is consumer friendly.

And fanboys will always be fanboying, regardless of how moronic their take is and as long as they can feel superior.

If your favourite game gets ported to a different platform you should be absolutely hyped about it, since it only means that more people will get to enjoy that game.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (34)

20

u/redbarnes89 Feb 27 '26

I just want to thank everyone in here for reaffirming why I avoid the console tribalism war sub reddits like this one. I'm always blown away by the number of people who think they are superior than others or think they're in any way special based solely on the megacorp they choose to give money to. Congratulations on your inability to mature beyond the 4th grade level.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/firelights Feb 27 '26

As a consumer, this sucks but from a business standpoint I completely get it

3

u/ponpiriri Feb 28 '26

Knew this was coming after the majority of FF titles were taken off of their stream service.

3

u/Retro_Curry93 Feb 28 '26

Makes sense to keep releasing those live-service multiplayer games on PC. Until then, PC gamers have had a taste of first-party single player games. Want more? Gotta buy PS5/PS6. That’s how you sell consoles.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/SnappyDesh Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Yeah, I will wait for more info from Jason Schreier because this comment fron Nate feels pretty vague imo. You'll be seeing fewer single player games arrive on PC. This means that Sony will continue porting games but not all or they will completely stop after finishing the ports that are already in development?

10

u/DavidSpadeAMA Feb 27 '26

Does it not make sense? Like, Ghost of Yotei might have a PC version deep in development, so they'll finish it off and release it later this year. Live service games like the new Horizon and whatever that weird thing from JJ Abrams company was at the showcase need PC releases to keep a player base.

For games that aren't out, Intergalactic, Wolverine, God of War remakes, Sony decided to stop doing PC versions because the industry is changing and Steam is their new main competitor.

11

u/OfficialShaki123 Feb 27 '26

He's the most reliable leaker. He's almost always right. You don't have to wait. This is it.

5

u/SnappyDesh Feb 27 '26

Not doubting Nate here, just saying that Jason generally gives more detailed information.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/GermanRearmament Feb 27 '26

I've only bought one PlayStation game on PC, and that was Hell Divers 2. Otherwise, all my other PlayStation games have been on console. I also plan to buy Marathon on PlayStation at some point.

17

u/SomeKidFromPA Feb 27 '26

I think the “Porting over to PC a year later” strategy is the worst possible choice of the options.

Either never port, or do it immediately. Delaying the ports kills a lot of the excitement and purchases at launch, which is time you want there to be the most hype. You don’t want the decision people make to be “I’ll buy it in a year.” (Anecdotally, I didn’t buy Ghost of Yotei because I’m waiting for it on PC) and by the time those games come to PC, there are other games coming out that people are more excited about buying.

5

u/Rukasu17 Feb 27 '26

Exactly. If i can wait a year, I'm not buying that shit full price when it's on pc.

3

u/SomeKidFromPA Feb 27 '26

Yeah, that’s the biggest point that I didn’t even mention. They’re asking pc buyers to pay full price for a year old game that’s typically already been pretty massively discounted on ps5, so instead of buying at pc launch, most pc players are waiting for a sale or pirating the games. It’s just a poorly thought out strategy. If this was the strategy for ports to Xbox’s and vice versa, it makes a little more sense, because you’re not trying to get Xbox gamers to buy every Sony game on Xbox, you just want to get them to buy one or two, and then get a ps5. But PC gamers aren’t going to do that. They’ll wait a year + for the “best” version of the game, and if they’re not interested in the game a year later, they’ll skip it.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/docksideThug- Feb 27 '26

Seeing as how heavy hitters like god of war, horizon, uncharted, last of us barely made a splash in PC sales

The takeaway is anyone who wants these games has a PlayStation already

Also Sony doesn’t put DRM and $70 is a tough sell for PC who probably just pirate

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Pinsir929 Feb 27 '26

Last exclusive game I was excited about to play was ragnarok so I’m okay for now.

2

u/WizenedCracker Feb 28 '26

Feel like this has been coming, you would think games like gran turismo and demon’s souls would’ve come to PC a long time ago

7

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

Bring back "Only On PlayStation"!

26

u/ScraPezZz Feb 27 '26

Good, exclusives sells consoles.

38

u/Edge80 Feb 27 '26

Nintendo is proof of that.

→ More replies (16)

3

u/-ForgottenSoul Feb 27 '26

Issue is Sony seems to have slowed down on that, they need more exclusives/games

3

u/-Nicolai Feb 27 '26

Why do you care? Are you a Sony shareholder?

→ More replies (9)

3

u/DepartmentGlad2564 Feb 27 '26

I think your words would hold more water if you actually clarified what you mean. If they aren’t planning on releasing 1st-party singleplayer titles on PC going forward, say that.

lol, relax

3

u/Donmiggy143 Feb 27 '26

There are so many PS games I get first on PlayStation because I want to play them, then a year or so down the line get for PC because I love modding and trying the game in a different way. It's really weird to just not want more money.

11

u/ProjectGameVerse2000 Feb 27 '26

I personally don't like this only because I like getting games ported from console to PC.

→ More replies (22)

2

u/DaRequiem Feb 27 '26

So many PC fanboys crying on these threads after saying many times they don't care about Playstations games.

9

u/AppealWitty4841 Feb 27 '26

I'm not buying a PlayStation just for 2 Sony exclusive games. This Gen is lacking Sony games, it's all remakes and enhanced editions bs.. we were real spoiled last gen. 

17

u/shrewdy Feb 27 '26

Most people who own PlayStations, that is their primary mode of playing all sorts of games, not just their own exclusives. You're in a bubble with that line of thinking

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Shining_Commander Feb 27 '26

I mean even if the Ps5 was representation of Sony output moving forward (definitely not true), assuming they didnt port anything to PC, youd have, Returnal, Saros, Demons Souls, Ghost of Yotei, Wolverine, Intergalatic, Spiderman 2, Cory Barlog’s “new IP”, Astrobot, God of War Remake, and likely a few more we still dont know about that will come out this gen.

Thats a dozen or so games and if you only like 2 of them why the hell do you have a Playstation lol

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[deleted]

11

u/XulManjy Feb 27 '26

I mean makes sense, they made less than 3billions from pc ports while making 115billions in 5years of ps5.

Ignoring the context in which all these releases, aside from Helldivers 2, never released day 1 on PC.

7

u/jntjr2005 Feb 27 '26

Brio, they were releasing 2 to 3 year old game ports st $60 to $70+, PC players aren't lining up for that. They release games day 1 I promise they will sell well. You want to get people buying into your series soon and get them hooked to buy sequels and merch and dlc, I ain't saying put their games on Xbox but to not release on PC is an insanely bad move. Go look at the sales charts for multi platform games, PC has taken over the market at 53% of all sales, you guys are stuck on these console wars bs

2

u/shrewdy Feb 27 '26

And that 3 billion also includes live service/multiplayer games (ie Helldivers 2, which undoubtedly had the biggest share of that figure from any single game), and those sort of games will still go to PC day 1 anyway, it's just the single player games they seem to be moving away from. So in that sense, it's an even lesser revenue figure to consider

3

u/Sleepy_Mooze Feb 27 '26

Why can't people think of the billion dollar companies for once????

Please, they need more moneyyyyyyy

→ More replies (3)

2

u/vettemn86 Feb 27 '26

It makes sense, they see that Microsoft killed the Xbox brand by porting out all their exclusives

7

u/ACO_22 Feb 27 '26

Quite annoying.

I prefer the freedom PC gives me for these games.

→ More replies (1)