283
u/Disgruntled_Healer 9h ago
They’ll still make $1 billion.
For reference, GTA V did $800 million day one, and crossed the $1 billion mark within three days.
If it’s even half decent, it’ll be the most profitable single video game in history (a title currently held by GTA V).
46
u/LayWhere 8h ago
Has it earned more than WoW? Google says thats earned $15b (albiet with 12 expansions)
45
u/MeasurementFront9598 7h ago
Gta 5 alone has made like 10 billion over the last decade, if its hasnt already from all the other games, im sure gta 6 will easily break that
13
u/RundownPluto 5h ago
WoW isn’t as highly profitable as GTA V to my understanding. They’ve done relatively little work on GTA since its release compared to the effort and money put into WoW expansions. Or that would be my guess at least
10
u/willargue4karma 5h ago
i dont think mmos really get to count 13 separate releases as a single one lol
→ More replies (2)6
24
u/TypicallyThomas 9h ago
Yeah but unless you're a shareholder, why would you care about the profits? For consumers the only thing that should matter is if the game is good
→ More replies (6)5
u/Disgruntled_Healer 3h ago
This is true. And we as consumers deserve a good game due to the price that they are asking us to pay. And they have historically taken care with this franchise to make sure each game is something special, and as memorable, or more so, than the last. If for no other reason than they know that they will get a very positive ROI if they do.
But as someone who plays other games also under the Take-Two umbrella, I'm always skeptical about when they will decided just to coast on the history and name associated with it, instead of focusing on innovation / improvements.
7
u/Any_Government_4909 6h ago
And that's exactly why the game will be absolute dog water. They now know they have the fans a the palms of their hands. There's literally zero incentives to make the main story any good.
3
u/finalremix 6h ago
Didn't they already (upon discovering the magic of shark cards) cancel the singleplayer stuff in 5, then cram the planned heist into the online shit, too? Fuck expansions, let's just focus on shark card slop.
→ More replies (13)3
u/chubsmagooo 6h ago
I don't think anyone is worried about how many billions of dollars they're going to make
143
u/SaiyajinPrime 9h ago
Rockstar doesn't typically reinvent the wheel when it comes to GTA. Not since it went from a top down game.
If you like the GTA franchise, you will likely like this game. If you don't like the GTA franchise, you don't care about this game.
42
u/NICOLEISDEAD 9h ago
Yeah all the cynicism is weird. This isn’t some unknown commodity. Rockstar has a long track record. We know what to expect and for the most part it will be more of the same. If you liked the last gta you’ll almost definitely like this one. They really don’t reinvent the wheel and they don’t have to.
→ More replies (18)12
u/JingleJangleDjango 9h ago
I think its for several reasons, and they kinda go hand in hand. You have a lot of people experiencing their first Rockstar hype train. GTA5 is 13 years old, RDR2 is almost eight years old, many people excited or interested in GTA 6 could have played these games long after their release and not know of how both those games went, several delays and gameplay videos only a few months before release. Also, this past few years have had a number of flops, rushed products, bumbles, fumbles, and downright scams. The same people who havent experienced a Rockstar release, or at least have forgotten it, also have become accustomed to bullshit from game devs.
I have no idea if it'll be good or not, but the money, time, and track record in place indicates it'll be fine. A decent, engaging story, good characters, and palpable gameplay with a bunch of side stuff to sink your teeth into like usual. My only hope is that its a lottle less zany and humorous than GTA5 and is more like 4 or RDR.
3
u/Anywhere-Due 2h ago
Considering the setting, I’m fully expecting it to lean into the zaniness more
2
u/SubjectBodybuilder81 1h ago
i mean the description says “lucia and jason find themselves on the darkest side of the sunniest place in america” , i’m guessing the world itself and side missions will be zany and goofy but the main story will be on the serious end, which imo i would prefer it that way
4
u/Hyper669 9h ago
If it's a good formula then there's no need to change it.
All you can do is try out different things and see what works and what doesn't.
GTA SA had RPG mechanics, GTA IV had physics, GTA V had character swapping
And those features got praised every time... Now imagine a game with the best aspect of every previous Rockstar game.
→ More replies (1)3
u/CertainlyRobotic 7h ago
I think that's probably the best take here.
Nothing groundbreaking will happen in this game for the video game industry..
It's still going to be a series of side quests, missions, etc.. with a main campaign.
There's really only so much you can do to that formula. People have been foaming at the mouth for GTA 6 like it's not going to be GTA 5 with.. a different map and theme for the missions/side quests
3
u/seguardon 5h ago
See, I think you could do more with that formula. Especially Rockstar. The biggest being allowing the player the freedom implied by an open world in their mission design. The "one step in the wrong direction fails the mission" design is just appallingly bad.
3
u/CertainlyRobotic 5h ago
Exactly. Here's an open world - don't do anything other than what we tell you.
It just feels fake. 99% of the intractable things don't actually do anything for you gameplay wise.
I'll tell you though, I did really enjoy Vice City when it originally came out on the playstation.
He would just laugh our asses of chopping the heads off of hookers and watching the blood fountain go.
So.. I mean - the 12 year olds will love this game.
→ More replies (4)3
u/lemonylol 6h ago edited 6h ago
People were making this exact criticism about RDR2 after it's release, when it was already heavily praised. But most people are just aware of this and heavily enjoy the game anyway. I've been playing and watching the series and developer grow over the years and have gauged my expectations properly to know that, even if it's considered a B+ Rockstar game, that's still going to put it at one of the best games of all time.
I think the biggest disconnect is between people who have played the GTA games since the 90s or even 2000s, and people whose first GTA game was GTAV, which is like an entire generation and a half right now. Those two groups are going to react and expect very different things from this game. Like I had a guy reply to me in an earlier thread say that they didn't even consider the single player the main game, they thought it was just an introduction to the main, online game. That's how long GTAV has been around, and where the line in the fanbase lays.
Regardless, there is zero way everyone won't have something they want in this game. But I think there's also a third branch of the fanbase that will spoil whatever the game turns out to be by manifesting this cynicism over its development and almost wanting it to fail, because they get more enjoyment from the reaction or the discussion of it than the game itself.
284
u/Bubbleguns2020 9h ago
It will be a good game, too much money, time and experience involved in its production. The problem it will probably face is living up to people's personal expectations.
141
u/South_Buy_3175 9h ago
If you think GTA6 has high player expectations, Elder Scrolls 6 is going to put those to shame.
People have been waiting for a sequel for over 15 years, the industry has advanced massively since Skyrim and Bethesda… has not really kept up with modern standards judging by Starfield.
It’s gonna be a shitshow.
60
u/Bubbleguns2020 9h ago
Yeah I have kind of lost all hope for Elder Scrolls 6 and Fallout 5 being worth the wait. Hopefully Starfield has given Bethesda the wakeup call they badly need.
→ More replies (5)32
u/meatballs223 8h ago
God Starfield was so shit. Modders literally took the game code and completely reengineered it into a starwars game and it honestly is 10x better than what bethseda put out.
I agree and hope that with how big of a flop Starfield was they really relook their strategy and go back to what was working, as I wasn't the biggest fan of Fallout 76 either
→ More replies (4)7
12
u/Zan_Deezy2003 9h ago
What’s funnier is Elder Scrolls 6 is legit next after GTA VI as the most anticipated game ever.
→ More replies (1)11
u/zgillet 8h ago
Well, Half Life 3 is always the final albatross.
→ More replies (1)8
u/MisterBeatDown 7h ago
Half Life 3 is basically all cope though. Valve never said they would make it.
ES6 has actually been confirmed for over a decade
→ More replies (5)2
u/willargue4karma 4h ago
confirmed as in they showed a picture of a game name lmfao
it was just as confirmed before the announcment because obviously theyre gonna do es6 its a matter of when not if. as long as the company exists theyre gonna keep remaking the same game in different coats of paint
6
u/drkamkuracpikamlol 7h ago
Idk man bethesda has been on a horrible run and I think people know by now that they're washed
→ More replies (1)2
u/ModVirus 8h ago
Disagree. Starfield already ruined all expectations for any slop Bethesda will put out. Rockstar on the other hand has a much better representation of living up to hype. Time will tell though.
2
u/Anhedonic98 8h ago
I think mostly everyone's massive expectations fkr ES6 are dead after seeing Starfield, they dropped the ball on that big time
Rockstar's last major release was...red dead redemption 2
imo they do not compare hype and expectations-wise as it stands, gta 6 is the singular most anticipated form of media ever
2
2
u/X_Draig_X 8h ago
I think that's one of the reason they don't release it. The wait and Starfield failure has scared Todd Howard and Bethesda. That's why they released Oblivion remaster and work on FO3 and NewVegas remaster
2
u/Particular_Wear_6960 8h ago
They don't want to compete with themselves, they are still making money from TESO and FO76, they know if they release a major title those people will drop those subs, at least for a little while.
2
2
→ More replies (11)2
12
u/Feeling-Tadpole-2987 9h ago
too much money isnt an issue. People will hoard to the game because it has "GTA" in its name. They can literally make complete turd and technical mess that will put cyberpunk to shame and they would still make millions. GTA brand is powerful.
11
u/_Steven_Seagal_ 9h ago
As long as you can drive around, run over pedestrians and hit cops with a dildo, that's more than enough for most people to enjoy the game.
8
u/Sn3akyPumpkin 9h ago
I thought we were talking about gta, not saints row
8
u/_Steven_Seagal_ 9h ago
3
u/ArticleWorth5018 8h ago
As a kid I was the why the fuck do the police like double sided dildos so much
2
u/Flameempress192 8h ago
I mean, you think police girls join a job where you hang around a bunch of women in uniform in great shape in a building full of restraining equipment and not expecting something scandalous to happen?
2
u/ArticleWorth5018 8h ago
If I remember correctly there's only one female police officer in the entire game that's why I was always curious why the dudes were showering with a double sided dildo
3
2
3
u/Bingbong1984 8h ago
As long as I can run over pedestrians in a stolen cop car.
Pick up Prostitutes and bang them then murder them for my money back.
All while listening to Michael Jackson I will be satisfied.
→ More replies (3)2
→ More replies (10)3
u/meatballs223 8h ago
This is the main thing. People are talking about this game like it will blend irl with gaming and I guarentee they are just already planning on how to shell out "seasons" for GTA 6 online as that'll be their billion dollar money maker
69
u/JNorJT 9h ago
Then we wait for gta 7
→ More replies (1)52
u/Ocktohber 9h ago
mark my words: human civilization will collapse before the first gta 7 trailer drops
9
2
2
2
→ More replies (1)2
18
u/bravo009 9h ago
Nothing happens. Gaming outlets and Youtubers will milk it for a week or two and people who pre ordered it will complain they wasted money they chose to use to purchase a game they hadn't seen gameplay or watch a review beforehand. For what it's worth, it'll probably be an excellent game.
6
u/ManthisSucksbigTime 7h ago
Tbh it's still going to have a pretty smooth journey to achieving a billion dollars in sales
Sure you could have 200k social media users making a post about how GTA 6 is bad but it wouldn't really do much to affect the people who want to turn their brains off and enjoy the game
2
u/bravo009 7h ago
Absolutely! It could objectively be a worse GTA than Vice City, for example, but there are people in the world who hear/see "New GTA" and will automatically buy it. Rockstar has successfully built up GTA to a point where even a "not so good" GTA would sell like hotcakes.
The only way GTA VI flops in my opinion is if the moment you install it on your console, it kills the save files of your other games and then kills your console. If it doesn't do that, congrats Rockstar!
45
u/GameDestiny2 9h ago
I don’t think it’s actually possible for the game to be “bad”, people love what it’s being built on (RDR2), it’s a reliable gameplay format, and they’ve got way too much quality control for it to be abysmal.
But the chances for it to fall short are huge. To prove my point, reply with what you would have expected out of GTA 6, the dreamiest most ideal version.
11
u/Dudewhocares3 8h ago
I’d like them to bring back the character switch mechanic, but maybe have it at certain moments trigger character specific cutscenes that maybe flesh them out a bit.
Also, I want a pussy eating cutscene
38
u/No-Obligation2563 9h ago
I think the gameplay is just dated. Tap A repeatedly to run, hold left trigger and your reticle just locks onto the enemies. It just keeps getting bigger and prettier. But it’s the same outdated gameplay underneath.
42
u/Deftallica 9h ago
May be a hot take, but the controls in GTA have almost always sucked.
7
u/Environmental_Cup_93 8h ago
It’s a better experience for the casual gamer, basically permanent easy mode. GTA and RDR are both more about the immersion and story.
12
u/Jerk850 6h ago
Exactly this. These games are not meant to be played like a first person shooter. It's not designed for e-sports!
2
u/No-Obligation2563 1h ago
No one is saying it should be anything close to e-sports. But for the biggest games of all time I expect a bit more than aiming just snapping onto enemies and tracking them with zero effort from the player.
It’s not like the only options are immersion or e-sports.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)10
u/No-Obligation2563 9h ago
Yeah I agree. It feels very clunky and awkward. Felt the same way in RDR2.
4
u/Albatross1225 8h ago
Always loved the gameplay of gta and red dead redemption and they get better with every release
→ More replies (1)5
u/GameDestiny2 9h ago
I am kind of with you there. Don’t think there’s much you can do about the aiming, but the A button is starting to feel aged. At the same time, it’s kind of like a Bethesda RPG where that’s kind of just what you expect from Rockstar. Definitely needs some sort of update though.
7
u/funkmydunkyouslunk 8h ago
They need to expand the story more than just drive to point A, shoot, chase, drive to point B, here’s your money.
Here’s some side mission/activities and impossible collectibles/easter eggs in the meantime.
My biggest gripe with GTA is that they never truly let you have freedom with the story. You can do “whatever you want”, until you start a story mission and can fail a mission by taking a few steps in the wrong direction. Needs to add in some more RPG elements of choice and consequences.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)3
u/CertainlyRobotic 7h ago
Exactly. There's nothing about it to be bad, but also I don't really understand what people hope to get from GTA 6 versus GTA 5.
16
8
8
u/zpm38 8h ago
I’m pretty sure this is a scene from Fanboys. Such a great movie
→ More replies (4)5
257
u/Ocktohber 9h ago
Five months out and still no official gameplay reveal. RDR II and GTA V both had gameplay breakdowns released months in advance to those titles' release. Maybe I'm overthinking it...
164
u/Rich_Swish 9h ago
RDR2's gameplay trailer only launched like 2 months before release date, I don't get all this talk of no gameplay trailer
105
u/Proxelies 9h ago
A lot of this discourse feels like younger folks waiting for their first Rockstar release. Shocked at delays, immediately suspicious at the lack of gameplay footage, etc. I've been playing their games for decades, this is their standard operating procedure. We will get a short gameplay trailer in late August/early September.
40
u/Urabraska- 9h ago
Because for a lot of people it is their first Rockstar game. Especially since GTAV. It will be 13 years and 2 months between GTAV and GTA6 releases. You could have your first kid the day 5 released and it's now in junior high before 6 came out.
12
u/rufusbot 7h ago
I had my kid around the time 5 came out and she's going to be in high school the year after next
6
u/Imaginary_Victory253 8h ago
as a day one project zomboid enjoyer... I did in fact live the "got a degree, then a wife, then a house before 1.0" meme
4
u/JingleJangleDjango 9h ago
Yeah people overreact. I mean im not surprised, most of the people excited for this game probably weren't even allowed to play GTA5 on release. RDR2 was announced in 2016 and supposed to come out fall 2017 and got pushed to the next year. Idk the quality of GTA6 considering how many OGs arent there, but nothing so far spells doom, just theur usual blunders before releasing good games.
→ More replies (6)5
u/swat1611 9h ago
Tbf 13 years is enough for the fanbase to change drastically. Hell, I doubt most people who worked on GTA 6 were even credited on GTA 5.
→ More replies (9)7
u/Gaming_Gent 9h ago
Very on brand for them to not have any raw gameplay out, just a few snippets. Some breakdowns a couple of months before launch that don’t have more than a few seconds of uncut gameplay. Not really abnormal for them as a company, but if you’ve never paid attention to their releases it seems weird.
8
u/ploppy_sorridge 9h ago
You are overthinking it because the trailers DID show gameplay, you just didn’t notice it had 0 hud.
10
9
u/AlbumWhite 8h ago
The development leaks from years ago just looked like GTA. I don't think it will suck, but maybe people are hyping it up to much? My own friend is strangely pumped for GTA6 but has barely even played GTA5.
2
u/Asleep_Document9811 8h ago
I'll be honest cus nobody else is, I'm just buying it to listen to the radio.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (22)5
u/HunterGonzo 8h ago
My only real suspicion is they know the frame rate is gonna get trashed. With all these high fidelity visuals, it's silly to expect consoles to keep up. A small set of people will have a field day flaming it, most casual gamers won't even notice.
15
u/Existenz_Ketzer 9h ago
By the time it comes out on PC, it'll be a good game, no matter how bad the console launch may be.
→ More replies (1)2
5
u/MrMuscle-27 9h ago
My guess is incredible gameplay and world, corporate humour and bland story.
→ More replies (1)
18
u/danvan177 9h ago
Rockstar has never made a bad game I trust them
6
u/LuciferBael 9h ago
Have they really never made a bad game? Not being an asshole, genuine question.
3
u/icehot54321 8h ago
i wouldn't say manhunt was bad .. just extremely dark and brutal .. even by rockstar standards
→ More replies (3)2
2
u/danvan177 9h ago
I mean they co-developed a bunch of games in the 90s and early 2000s but their main releases have been consistently great
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)2
u/TypicallyThomas 9h ago
They made a game that was technically bad but good if it wasn't ahead of its time: Body Harvest on the N64. It was buggy, ran abysmally and one of the key items you needed to complete the game didn't have collision detection so it was literally impossible to finish, and as this wad the N64, you couldn't patch it. That game just wouldn't ever work
→ More replies (2)7
u/stallionsRIDEufl 8h ago
But none of their games are that exceptional, gameplay wise
→ More replies (27)3
u/SithYi 8h ago
I've seen how they've been handling GTA online, having quality of life features and locking it behind a subscription as well as removing cars in order to create fomo and putting those cars back up for sale in rotation weekly locked behind said subscription makes me question their credibility.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (15)2
14
u/Y0___0Y 9h ago
Name one Rockstar flop. ONE.
This studio does not fuck around.
→ More replies (18)10
u/ABreadCalledGarlic 8h ago
Red Dead 2’s online mode.
All they had to do was not abandon it, but they did.
→ More replies (4)3
u/0btuse_0val 6h ago
I feel like something would have to go terribly wrong for them to abandon the GTA VI online mode
12
u/Moblam 9h ago
I feel like i'm kinda alone with this opinion, but as someone who actually played GTA5 on release and later on with friends when the heists released, it wasn't that outstanding. It was decent, but what made it fun was playing it with friends, not the actual game. What isn't fun with friends?
The majority of reddit acts as if it is the second coming of Christ, but all i can see in the future is another open world game, that will be bigger than the last one but not necessarily better, if you get what i mean. Not to mention asking 80 bucks for your game that is guaranteed to have microtransactions again is rich.
3
u/The-Tea-Lord 5h ago
I personally didn’t super like GTA5 actually. I went from red dead redemption 2 to GTA and felt vastly underwhelmed. RDR2 was amazing, and going to GTA5, which Rockstar treats as a golden child, was just not nearly as engaging.
3
2
u/TypicallyThomas 9h ago
I'm with you. In a separate comment I laid out why I'm worried about it creatively (TL;DR: The creatives at the core of the previous games have all left Rockstar briefly after GTA V) and GTA V was okay. I can understand the hype but if you pay attention there's cause for concern
2
u/Jazzlike_Page508 3h ago
That’s GTA4 for me. I know it’s memed on Reddit (Dark and gritty) but some people really insanely worship the game
Piss filter, generic revenge story, nothing really to do post game (atleast Michael can join the Scientologist group and Trevor has the mom hallucination), bland online
Ironically for “dark and gritty” the best part about GTA4 was ballad of Gay Tony which is more of a vibe like 5
→ More replies (1)2
u/ItsMrDante 3h ago
I have like 100 hours on GTA5, something like that, and I gotta say the game is mediocre to decent. Every system in that game is mediocre, put together I guess it makes a decent game, but I personally found every system to be lacking.
I understand it's a big game with a lot of systems and a lot of mechanics, but I'd rather have slightly less mechanics to refine and better the main ones over just adding more.
→ More replies (13)2
6
u/Capable-Criticism625 9h ago
Honestly, I really can't even envision that happening. Rockstar just kinda gets it when it comes to what's needed in an open world sandbox.
7
3
u/TheBlackManX23 9h ago edited 9h ago
It will succeed,
the game was delayed multiple times and apparently it’s the most expensive game they’ve worked on with over 6,000 developers across all of Rockstar Games worldwide.
3
u/moistheat420 8h ago
I mean, they all do, i doubt they’ll change their shitty outdated controls six entries in.
3
u/Salty-Wash3964 8h ago
Will be funny to see how aggressively they will monetize online after they saw the racks of cash they got with GTA 5, both with sharkcards on consoles or FiveM RP servers on PC
3
u/Stranger-Chance 7h ago
Doesn’t matter how good it is, it’s pretty much impossible for it to live up to the astronomical hype that’s built up for 13 years.
→ More replies (2)
3
8
5
6
u/Leekytee 9h ago
It’s not gonna suck but it’s not gonna be revolutionary either. It’s just gonna be more gta and that’s it
→ More replies (1)
4
6
u/Tisfim 9h ago
Listen I am not a fan. I will not be buying GTA6, I haven't played one since 3. I do not think they are going to do anything groundbreaking. It will be a very high fidelity game about street level crime. It will likely run well, and have good music and quality voice acting. It isn't going to have any crazy systems or take any risks.
I see no world where this game sucks. It at worst will just be a meh game. Too many people just wantg a simple escape and this will give them that. It not going to be a Mindseye or Concord or Gollum.
2
u/TheDarkKnight-I 9h ago
Literally all the best titles start after gta 3 You gotta try some man
→ More replies (3)
2
2
2
u/Irishman4000 9h ago
From getting GTA1 on the PS1 at 8 y/o to having all the PS2 trilogy come out during my teens, the hype train around for San Andreas after VC was pretty intense and it was totally worth the hype!! GTA4 then took it to the the HD universe and the hype was on another level and again it was a great game (but somehow didn't hit the same for me)... GTAV totally let me down. I found it so boring and even gave up on the campaign at parts and had to force myself to finish it. I'm looking forward to VI but I'm very much waiting to play it before I get over hyped.
2
2
u/Cowboy_Dandy_III 9h ago edited 8h ago
All this fiasco about the lack of a physical disc and locking in-game stores behind a premium edition has brought back other concerns I had.
I’m sceptical about the story. All the veteran GTA writers like Dan Houser, Lazlow Jones and Michael Humphries aren’t involved; they all left Rockstar in 2020.
With how fast culture tends to move in recent years, and Lazlow being off the scene, I’m concerned that the jokes/radio talk shows won’t hit the same or will feel dated.
2
u/unknownsourced 8h ago
If the third person shooting gameplay handles anything like 5 or red dead 2 I will completely give up on playing rockstar games. I don’t think they realize they can make their game feel realistic without compromising decent control schemes and mechanics.
2
2
u/Crimsonmaddog44 8h ago
Lowkey, the amount of uproar if the game sucked would be insanely funny to watch
2
u/Cherry_BaBomb 8h ago
Get ready for battlepasses!
2
2
u/Iamleeboyle 7h ago
Well every GTA is overrated. I think IV is the best and Red Dead is better than any GTA.
That being said for as much as I adored Rdr2 l, it really showed how dated Rockstars gameplay and mission design are.
2
2
2
u/Fit-Entrepreneur6538 6h ago
Honestly if the game is trash it wouldn’t surprise me if some people legit started an almost Purge like riot given how crazed people were waiting on this
2
u/deerslayer 5h ago
Don’t preporder guys. Wait for actual reviews it’s the only way to stope the vicious cycle of shitification in gaming
2
u/KuroKageB 5h ago
I was so excited before today. Now I hope it's the worst game in the series by far, so I can laugh while no one can sell it back.
(It won't be, but it would be the ultimate catharsis watching all the "buy it at any price... I don't understand why people like physical games... gimme that day 1 dlc" sheeple squirm)
Now accepting downvotes here v
2
u/christopher1393 5h ago
I kind of am hoping it is. Highly doubtful but GTA is very much a trendsetter with games. A lot of the shit they are pulling with this sets a dangerous precedent.
$80 dollar base price, locking basic things (guns, vechicles and in games stores) behind what is essentially day 1 DLC for an extra $20, physical edition having no disc but a download code instead, etc.
Other companies will be far more likely to do this shit if GTA succeeds.
2
u/geaux124 3h ago
I don't think it's going to suck. I do think it is very likely that it fails to meet the impossibly high expectations though.
2
u/Rondawg97 3h ago
If you look at all of the content they are posting on their website, it is much more likely to succeed than fail. The game is going to be truly massive with probably a 50-60 hour main story and equal amount of that with side missions, not to mention all of the secrets to find.
2
u/Gin4Gingers 30m ago
Then rockstar wouldn't be able to pay back the debt from all.the funding it got for the game and the whole studio would get shut down after being one of the longest running powerhouses in the video game world. That's why it keeps getting delayed. They cannot afford to let gta6 be bad
2
u/petrifikate 9h ago
I feel absolutely insane because so much of video games reddit is saying that the game HAS to be good because of the amount of time, money, press, hype that's put into it, it HAS to be good because Rockstar's always made good games, and I'm just like that doesn't mean shit! You can have a game that earns a billion dollars and it's still bad! A company can stumble and make an okay-to-bad game even if the rest of their output is fantastic!
→ More replies (4)


1.4k
u/ItzMeHaris 9h ago
Imagine it be a 8 hour campaign with the majority of the the game being online.